Tuesday, October 21, 2025

South Australian 2026 Election - Political Updates Tracker 2.0

 Hello, and welcome to the second volume of my South Australian politics tracker! The original tracker was getting abit unwieldy (turns out adding dozens of news clips nearly 100mb big takes a toll on a Blogger page, whodatunk). I'm going to continue covering SA politics and its updates in this thread here, but if you want to check out the original thread (I highly suggest you do for continuity's sake), check it here.


12/11/2025 - Sarah Game's Anti-Abortion bill fails


In some good news, for a saga that keeps on happening despite everyone wanting it to be done with, Sarah Game's anti-abortion bill has failed. The bill, which sought to tightly restrict abortion after 23 weeks, was voted down 8-11. Before I note the 'known voters' below, I did want to quickly go over the abhorrent campaign ran by the anti-abortion campaigners. Namely, Joanna Howe. Howe, a professor of law at the University of Adelaide, has been the main figurehead and power behind the anti-abortion push in SA. You may remember her from the last vote where she literally intimidated Jing Lee into changing her vote, and was subsequently banned from parts of parliament for her conduct. Well, with this ongoing campaign, Howe has only (somehow) managed to stoop lower. She recently created an AI ad, using the deeply saddening story of a mother who had an abortion as its backdrop, and superimposing an AI-generated baby onto the mother telling the story. The AI-generated baby continually guilted the mother for her choice, in an ad which may be the coldest I have seen in my entire life. Meanwhile, today, Howe made her own 'game' out of the abortion debate, promising people points for a raffle if they paid for words which may be said by those debating in the Legislative Council. Safe to say, this abhorrent behaviour didn't go unnoticied in parliament, with Tammy Franks especially tearing Howe down. 

Moving on from the disaster that is Howe, as I mentioned, the bill was voted down 8 votes for to 11 against. While we don't have the full identities of who voted where, we do have some, courtesy of reddit user /u/Expensive-Horse5538 and their thread here. According to them, the voters were as such;

Those who voted against the bill:

  • Kyam Maher (Deputy Premier, ALP)
  • Tammy Franks (Independent)
  • Robert Simms (Greens)
  • Michelle Lensink (Liberals)
  • Jing Lee (Jing Lee – Better Community)
  • Ian Hunter (Labor)
  • Connie Bonaros (SA Best)
  • Mira El-Dannawi (ALP)
  • Emily Bourke (ALP)
  • Justin Hanson (ALP)
  • Russell Wortley (ALP)

Those who voted for the bill:

  • Sarah Game (Fair Go)
  • Ben Hood (Liberals)
  • Heidi Girolamo (Liberal)
  • Nicola Centofanti (Liberal)
  • Dennis Hood (Liberal)
  • Clare Scriven (ALP)
  • Tung Ngo (ALP)
  • Frank Pangallo (Liberals)

*Should also be noted that Laura Henderson (Liberal, for the bill) and Reggie Martin (ALP against the bill) paired out due to Henderson being on maternity leave.

Now, you may be wondering why Tung Ngo and Clare Scriven voted for the bill, being Labor and all? Well, they're both deeply catholic, with Scriven being especially religious. She is so religious that, quite recently, she attended the 'Seeking God for SA' Conference, which saw her speak alongside Deepa Mathew (Family First), Christopher Brohier (Family First), Dennis Hood (Liberals), and Ben Hood (Liberals). Her vote here is not that shocking all things considered, and both her and Ngo voted for the previous anti-abortion bill in 2024. What is more interesting is Jing Lee's vote against the bill, which she says is due to a year of research and education, and which I think is just down to her wanting to spite Howe. Both options are valid, in any case.

What this means for the state election is quite interesting. Game has already said she won't be backing down from the anti-abortion rhetoric, and so I assume she'll bring it into the next election as a policy. However, I doubt the whole saga has gone the way she wanted it, as she now has lost a key vote in the Legislative Council and is stuck with Joanna Howe as a hanger on (or is it the other way around?). Either way, Game and Howe probably aren't finished with their, and pardon my french, bullshit, so don't be shocked to see them here again soon.

News Articles

ABC | Abortion legislation voted down in South Australian Parliament


07/11/2025 - 12 new Greens candidates drop


Well, yesterday we got our biggest individual candidate 'drop' of the year, with the Greens revealing 12 new candidates for seats from Badcoe to Port Adelaide. Some are familiar electoral faces, others are new, and one is (and I say this with all sincerity), a legitimate clown. So follow me as I go through the 12 candidates one by one.

- Josh Andersen-Ward (Badcoe)

The first candidate on our list is a completely new one as far as I can tell. Andersen-Ward's not got any electoral experience to speak of, but he does have some significant credentials to back him up. He's been a corporate lawyer for SA Water, a Paralegal for RSA Law, a Complaints Officer for the Commonwealth Ombudsman, a Facilities Support Officer for CSIRO, and is currently studying his Masters in Accounting and Finance. He's not really the type of candidate you'd expect to be running for the Greens (finance and legal guy doesn't strike me as the type), so I'll be interested to hear more about him. 

- Sarah Luscombe (Black)

Our second is our first returning electoral candidate. Luscombe is probably best known as being the Green's candidate at the 2024 by-election for Black when David Speirs resigned from the seat. At that election, she won 13.1% of the vote, up by 1.3% from Liz Tidemann's result in 2022. She is also another local politician entering the 2025 election, being a councillor for the Coastal Ward of the City of Marion. She is also a clinical psychologist, working primarily with children. All of this is to say that Luscombe is probably the most 'promising' of the bunch, though with rumours that Speirs is eyeing a return to politics, it seems that Black will be a very difficult seat to contest.

- Susan Ditter (Bragg)

Ditter does not have much on her in regards to her current life in South Australia. Annoying, I know. However, her past does shed some light on her. She was a board member for the Pride Foundation Australia in Tasmania, the Executive Officer of Working It Out, and the chair of the board for the National LGBTI Health Alliance. All of this is to say that she is, obviously, an LGBTQI+ ally and advocate (as can be seen by her parlimanetary submissions on multiple issues). She is also the granddaughter of Otto Kurt Ditter, founder of Ditters Nuts which can be found in the Adelaide Arcade.

- Matthew Wright (Colton)

There is barely anything out there about Matthew Wright, and most searches for him are dominated by the Matthew Wright who played for the Adelaide Crows between 2011-2015. I can tell you two things about him though. Firstly, he was the Greens candidate for Hindmarsh at the 2025 federal election, winning 13.6% of the vote there (down 0.3% from 2022). Secondly, he is not the Matthew Wright who was the candidate for Sturt for the Nick Xenophon Team at the 2016 federal election who wasn't actually sure what NXT stood for. Unfortunately for Wright, and his future SEO, he's sandwiched between a middling football player and a mostly forgotten political candidate that will still overwhelm him search engine wise.

- John Photakis (Davenport)

Another Greens candidate who there is scarcely little about, and who also contested a previous election. And trust me, I tried finding anything about Photakis, I've known about his candidacy for weeks, and theres just nothing. What little I can find is from him, and it is essentially is that he's a 'stupol hack' (ahving been in student council at Flinders Uni and student voice at TAFE SA), and is a perennial candidate. He contested Kingston at the 2025 federal election for the Greens, getting 13.5% of the vote (up 1% from 2022), at the 2022 federal election for the Greens, getting 12.4% of the vote (up 3.2% from 2019), and Davenport in the 2022 state election for the Greens, getting 9.4% of the vote (up 2.2%). His candidancy for the Greens actually goes all the way back to the 2018 state election (also for Davenport), and he was a council candidate for the Thalassa Ward of the City of Onkaparinga in 2022. All that is to say that, him having nothing but politics on the internet means there probably isn't much more there in reality, but he's only gone up in votes year-on-year, so we'll see if he does any better this time round.

- Stef Rozitis (Elder)

Rozitis has a long resume of teaching going on for over a decade. She's been a school teacher, a preschool teacher, and a tutor at all three major universities. More interesting to me, she is a member of the 'Woke Lesbo Symposium', "a collective of writers from Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia of diverse backgrounds, gender identities and sexual orientations whose members produce creative work and scholarship within a social justice framework." She's also a previous candidate of the Greens, having ran for the seat of Badcoe at the 2018 state election, getting 7.9% of the vote (down 3.9% but that is due to the seat being redistributed from the seat of Ashford and the existence of NXT).

- David Deex (Elizabeth)

Another previous candidate of the Greens, Deex ran for the seat of Spence in the 2022 federal election, winning 11.3% of the vote (up 4.14%). He is also a member of the Anti-Poverty Network. Perhaps most notable about them is that they were the Youth Governor for the 2024 South Australian Youth Parliament. Deex's speech as Youth Governor included a quote from the village people, so, there's some good taste there at least.

Deex as Youth Governor at the back
Deex as Youth Governor at the back


- Alexandra McGee (Florey)

McGee is another one of the Greens candidates with a long resume. She's been a tutor/manager for the International College of Hospitality and Management, the University of Adelaide, and TAFE SA. She's also been an assessor for foundational English at two colleges and the academic team leader at a military technological college, all in Oman, as well as Head of Oman's Dental College and Project Manager for the British Council in Oman. Finally, she's also been an english teacher in Korea and Japan as well. Add on her volunteering experiences with Girl Guides SA and Backpacks for Kids, and she seems to have a veritable wealth of world experience, at the very least. Honestly, where do people find the time?

- Melanie Searle (Hartley)

Off the bat, Searle is the most like Labor's most recent candidates, in that, like them, she was already very well connected to the party's internals. Searle has been the executive assistant for the SA Greens for the last two years, and before that held a litany of various jobs. These include Medical Secretary for an Endoscopy Clinic, Personal Assistant to Investment SA's CEO, Project Officer for Health Industries SA, an Audio Typist for Urology SA, and an Executive Assistant at Baptist Care SA. Not much to say about her politically, but she has got a degree in International Development which she specifically highlights on her candidate page.

- Sean Weatherly (Kaurna)

Weatherly might be my favourite candidate of the 2026 state election so far. Firstly, he is a previous candidate, having ran for the Greens in Kaurna in the 2022 state election, winning 10.8% of the vote (up 1.7%). He's been a council candidate before for the city of Onkaparinga and is a member of the Anti-Poverty Network. All of this though pales into what actually makes me interested in him, in that he is a genuine stage performer. Now, he does say he is also a film and TV performer on his website, but his IMDB suggests he has been, at best, an extra with a couple of lines. However, he has his own stage production company, Loaded Productions, which has performed at various Fringe festivals and has the ongoing musical "Price Check! The Supermarket Musical". This musical is described as "The world's first post Covid-19 musical, set in a suburban supermarket the year after the pandemic" and all its messaging seems very socially conscious, but I'd be interested to watch it. Finally, and perhaps most notable to me (and I want to state I am not making any fun here, I am just genuinely interested), Weatherly has, for the last 15 years, preformed as Noodles the Clown. This, and his alternate persona Pirate Sean, mean that it is highly likely many South Australians who are voting for the first time this election may have had Weatherly at their childhood birthdays, which I think is an incredibly interesting concept. I've linked the photos down below mainly because I'm interested to see if anyone who stumbles across this blog has any experience with Noodles.

Sean as Pirate Sean
Sean as Pirate Sean
Sean as Noodles the ClownSean as Noodles the Clown
Sean as Noodles the Clown


- Isabella Litt (Morphett)

A new entrant into the political arena, Isabella Litt is, in her own words, "a certified yoga teacher, meditation enthusiast, intuitive tarot reader, and facilitator of women's circles". She is qualified in Vinyasa, Yin, and Tibetan (Mastery of) Yoga, as well as being a counsellor, and a Usui Reiki Master. I assume you're as confused as I am, and if you're not, please let me know what all this means. 

- Hayden Shaw (Port Adelaide)

Now, Shaw is perhaps the most non-Greens candidate I've ever seen. He is an Army vet, a small business owner and a financial professional, and a volunteer for sporting organisations. Atleast, thats what his candidate page says he is, as, also unlike most Greens candidates, he's not easy to find online. If I find more, I'll write it in here. 

25/10/2025 - Hammond's got a new candidate (that I missed)


Just a short supplementary update to the thread, since I somehow missed this a couple days prior. Labor has announced their candidate for Hammond (the seat that holds Murray Bridge), it being Mid-Murray Mayor Simone Bailey. Bailey's got a background in finance (everything from being an auditor, to an investigator, to an accountant) and otherwise is a board member for an aged care association and Country Arts SA. 

She's the third announced candidate for Hammond, following the Liberal's Adrian Pederick (the current MP), and Independent Arline Keen (Mayor for Murray Bridge).

News Articles:



25/10/2025 - Housing is back on the menu


This week has seen the Greens, Labor, and the Liberals all dish out (atleast part) of their housing policy going into the coming election. They range from good, to eh, to not good respectively, even if the Liberals get points for creativity.

Breaking it down chronologically, the Greens were first off the block with their housing policy announcement. While the headlines were a $6.7bn cost with plans to build 20,000 public homes in 4 years and clear out the public housing maintenance backlog (which is currently at an unsustainable level), perhaps most interesting is the fact that the Greens announced their goal of re-establishing the SA Housing Trust as a publicly owned builder. The Trust would then be the one to develop those 20,000 homes and clear out the backlog without having to engage with private contractors. This, of course, is both a short- and long-term policy. Unchaining the housing trust from its need to work with private companies would allow it to focus on building up public housing to combat the current housing crisis, and also plan additional housing supply in the long term. As such, there's not much to complain about with the Greens' policy, especially as they also announced that they'd be establishing a Commissioner for Rental Tenancies who'd have the power to investigate and enact penalties around renters' rights infringements.

From this good (and cohesive) policy, we move onto the Liberals, whose policy left alot to be desired. Really, I'm shocked it was announced as a standalone policy. Their policy is a $40mil fund to build 4,000 prefabricated and modular homes by 2032. Note, that is around 666 homes per year from 2026, versus the Greens' 5,000 homes per year. There's not really much to talk about with this policy other than it's half-baked and otherwise not the most helpful on its own, though points for creative thinking that the housing crisis can be fixed in this manner.

And finally, today Labor has announced its latest housing policy. The policy is a $500m guarantee fund that apartment developers in the CDB can join. This fund would see the government guarantee up to 50% of a development's apartments (up to a $30m cap) and buy apartments that remain unsold for 10% less than the market rate. There's alot of terms and conditions attached to it that aren't super relevant right now, but broadly, this is an eh policy. It'll likely fast-track a few apartments, but as far as I can tell there's no restriction on whether these apartments need to be affordable, built for families, or built well. Without that, it's possible that developers building apartments for short-term living or the rich will attach themselves to this guarantee, and that won't really help the housing crisis. It also isn't a comprehensive or long-term policy, and is lacking ambition. I would've preferred a government with a near-certain chance of a total victory at the election to bring out policies which could be described in any of those ways, but maybe I ask too much.

To end this update, I should note that the SA Socialists have had their party registration approved. Based on the InDaily article I'll link, and my own conversations with them, they'll be having their conference in November where they'll be revealing their candidates. For now, I've edited the party tracker, which you can find here.

News Articles:




News Clips

9 News



21/10/2025 - A Poll finally lands in our laps

For readability's sake, I've provided the polls at the bottom of this post.

Rejoice! The wait for state polling has finally finished. Seriously, we were in a major drought there for a second, with no poll since May and no poll featuring the Legislative Council since September 2022! The poll is highly welcome, as it provides me room to both confirm my speculation, and speculate even more. I'll leave the in-depth analysis to those who know it, I'm no expert on methodology or polling numbers, but it should be noted that the poll was undertaken by DemosAU and Ace Strategies and surveyed 1,006 South Australians with a 3.9% margin of error.

Now, diving into the poll, there's actually not much to discuss in regards to the lower house. Labor polled at 66% 2PP and 47% primary (both 1% lower than the last poll) while the Liberals have polled a dismal 34% 2PP (1% lower) and 21% primary (no change). There are no kind words to be said here for the Liberals' result, it is a horror show of the most disastrous proportions. And interestingly, this isn't a result I am entirely shocked by. The current talk around Adelaide is that some of the Liberal's internal polling has shown that Labor will win every seat in the state bar the ones held by Independents. This poll, rather worringly for the Liberals, seems to fall on the side of that talk being true. But its not all sunshine and rainbows for the 'left' in SA either. The Greens saw their primary polling drop from 13% to 11%, in what may be a repeat of the federal election for them. It does not help that the Greens are being assailed from two sides, with the resignation of Tammy Franks from their party and the foundation of the SA Socialists. Finally, 'Other' recieved a result of 19%, which would be incredibly high come the election, but does also show what I suspect to be a desire for independent candidates in specific seats (think Keiran Snape in Adelaide or Ryan Harrison in Unley). 

I want to move on from the boring lower house, though, to talk about the super interesting upper house. Labor polled at 37%, while the Liberals got only 17%. According to InDaily, this is a drop of 17.4% since the previous election for the Liberals (Labor had no change), an absolute shattering for the party, with it being projected that they would on win 2 seats to Labor's 4. One Nation meanwhile polled at 12%, 7.8% higher than the last election, and the Greens polled at 11%, 2% higher than the last election. Both parties were predicted to get one seat each, meaning that if the election was held today, Christel Mex and Carlos Quaremba would be joining the Legislative Council. It'd also mean that only Ben Hood and Heidi Girolamo would retain their seats from the Liberals, with all their other candidates having to fight over scraps. But there are scraps to be fought over, as according to the polls, 3 seats are in doubt.

And that is where the minor parties come in. 3 parties have polled at 4%, those being the Animal Justice Party, Legalise Cannabis, and SA-Best. Both AJP and SA-Best saw increases of over 2%, while Legalise Cannabis rose by just under 2%. This, imo, is the best indication that there's want for more from Labor and the SA political scene in general. SA-Best is essentially a dead brand run by a single politician (Connie Bonaros) who barely uses its name. AJP and Legalise Cannabis, while rising 'stars' across the political scene, are still not the most significant or well-run parties. And yet, if the preferences fall their way, all three parties have a shot at getting a seat. If you don't believe me, Sarah Game won her seat off just over 4.1% of the vote due to preferencing in 2022, and now we have 4 parties essentially at the same percent, atleast according to this poll. Moving on though, we have two parties who each polled at 3%, the Australian Family Party (Bob Day in a trenchcoat) and Family First, having gained 2.1% and lost 0.1% respectively. This is interesting for three reasons. Firstly, that Bob Day in a trenchcoat is able to take on the national Family First Party, whose playing in a usual strong state for them. Secondly, that 6% of South Australians want to vote for a 'Family' Party, and that they evenly split themselves amongst the two. And that thirdly, if the parties unified, according to the poll they'd have 6% of the vote which would probably be more than enough to get them a seat. Horrifying when you look at it that way, really.

Only 1 party got 2%, that being Stephen Pallaras - Real Change SA. Not much to say here, he's up 1.1% from the election, so he must be doing something right. If the 'mysterious' crash he was in doesn't slow him down, he could fight a real law and order campaign. And that takes us to the 1% parties. This includes the Nationals, who I consider an essentially dead party here, Sarah Game's Fair Go for Australians and the United Voice Australia Party. Game will probably not be happy that her party polled so low, considering it has a sitting MLC, recognisable names such as Henry Davis and Jake Hall-Evans, and the support of people like Dr Joanna Howe. Sitting next to Mark Aldridge's UVAP cannot feel good when you think of it like that (though Aldridge has been eternally shilling his party everywhere he goes). It is likely that the skyrocketing PHON poll has destroyed Sarah Game's chances, although there is every chance that the arrival of Turning Point SA (whose host, George-Alexander Mamalis is very close friends with Game and Davis) could turn things around if the conservative brand supports Fair Go. I'd absolutely hate it though. Ah, and before I forget, Jing Lee - Better Community polled an astonishing 0%. Maybe if the party had a better name or candidates or policies or something, it might do better. 

Before I round off this post, I did want to note what the poll excluded. Or more specifically, the parties it excluded. The Libertarians, SA Socialists, and Australian Citizens Party were not avaliable to be chosen for this poll. As such, those parties may very well shift the balance. The Libertarians will likely not poll higher than 1%, two Family Parties and One Nation will likely keep their vote down, while the ACP will get a result at the bottom of the election (but maybe in front of Jing Lee). Really, the Socialists are the most interesting, in that a good campaign from them may see them taking votes off the Greens in a space that isn't really contested.

LOWER HOUSE

Tuesday, August 19, 2025

South Australian State Election 2026 - Registered Parties Thread

With the South Australian State Election due to occur in 7 months, I have decided that it is time to create a post detailing the parties that have registered to run in that election. This won't be super in-depth, I'll save that for my regular party policies summary document that'll be out far closer to the election. It does contain a decent bit of my own opinion, but I'll leave my full subjective thoughts for my party reviews next year. Instead, this thread will simply outline each party registered, their leaders (with a short blurb), any key policies, and some other basic info. It is moreso a tool to keep track of the parties which exist as more come up, as inspired by Kevin Bonham's party tracker.


UPDATE | 29/08/2025: The first major update of this tracker has come to pass. I have moved For Unley to the Registered Parties section after its registration was approved yesterday. I have also moved the United Multicultural Alliance to the newly made Deregistered Parties section, after they were voluntarily deregistered. Finally, I have added in the Libertarian Party SA to the Pending Applications section.

Registered Parties


Animal Justice Party


Leader: Unknown

Ideologies: Animal Rights, Vegan Politics

Date Registered: 24/11/2016

Blurb: The Animal Justice Party we are all aware of. Perhaps the most well-known single issue party (debatable with the rise of Legalise Cannabis), AJP is dead set on animal rights and welfare. Their policies range from moderate to radical (including the ending of all animal farming). While they have not had electoral success in South Australia just yet, seats in NSW, Victoria, and WA's Legislative Councils suggest that their luck could change.

Australian Family Party


Leader: Bob Day

An infamous name in SApolitics circles, Bob Day has had a long 'career' in politics. Starting off as a Liberal party candidate, he soon left the party and joined Family First, becoming their most prominent candidate in SA. This eventually led to him, through the 2016 double dissolution, winning a senate seat, from which he quickly resigned. Following Family First's collapse in SA, Day created the Australian Family Party, running in the 2022 SA state election. More recently, he was the Trumpet of Patriot's 2nd Senate candidate for SA in the 2025 Federal election.

Ideologies: Social Conservatism, Conservative Family politics

Date Registered: 11/11/2021 

Blurb: Primarily a vehicle for the same crusades Bob Day has been fighting for the last decade, the AFP rose from the ashes of the Family First party to fight in the 2022 election. Claiming, amongst other things, that it fights for family resilience and free speech, Day being its leader is perhaps a clear enough example that those mean reduced protections and rights for minorities. In any case, the AFP only received 0.8% at the 2022 SA election, having had to compete with the reborn Family First Party. Its luck isn't looking any better this time around. 

Australian Greens SA


Leader: Robert Simms

Perhaps the only remaining big name in the SA Greens, Simms is an eternally interesting leader for the party. Beginning political life as a candidate for the Democrats in 2004, he made his way into the Greens by the 2010 state election, and was a city councillor for them in 2015. He entered the Legislative Council in 2015 to fill Penny Wong's spot as a casual vacancy, only to lose his seat in 2016 and return to the city council in 2018. Once again though, he'd be back in the Legislative Council through a casual vacancy, filling Mark Parnell's spot in 2021. Perhaps his most recent area of note is his connection to the 'Save the Cranker' movement, which was actually successful in 2024.

Ideologies: Green politics, left-wing progressivism

Date Registered: 13/02/1996

Blurb: The South Australian Greens are a party in an interesting state. With no members in the lower house, and only one in the upper house, they haven't really managed to capture proper third-party status like they have in other states and federally. This is further apparent by the fact that they haven't recieved over 10% of the vote in any SA state election they've contested. For the Greens, 2026 demonstrates a chance to finally breach that barrier, with many in the state on the left looking for an alternative to Malinauskus' Labor. However, the dramatic resignation of Tammy Franks from the party earlier in the year may demonstrate that the Greens in SA aren't yet ready to step up to the plate.

Australian Labor Party (South Australian Branch)


Leader: Peter Malinauskas 

What can you say about Peter Malinauskas, or Mali, that hasn't been said by the media or political hacks statewide. He's a smooth political operator and is good at curating his image, even if his politics leave alot to be desired for those further on the left at times. Coming into SA politics in 2015, he shot up the ranks quite quickly to become leader of the opposition in 2018, and obviously Premier in 2022. A man who keeps his political views close to his chest these days, everyone in South Australia has an opinion on this man for better or worse. One common thing you'll hear these days is alot of people betting that Malinauskas will hold the position of Premier for as long as Playford. Whether this is true, only time will tell, but it is certaintly interesting that earlier predictions of Malinauskas going into federal politics seem to have fallen silent. 

Ideologies: Social Democracy, Big-tent progressivism

Date Registered: 17/10/1985

Blurb: Quite simply, the SA Labor party is in perhaps the best position of its life. The most recent poll for the state predicted that not only would it win the 2026 election in a landslide, but that it would win all but 2 seats in the state's lower house. Almost certainly a left-leaning 'big tent' party these days, SA Labor seems to capture voters from the far-left all the way to the centre-right. Despite this though, the shine may begin wearing off soon, as the algal bloom issue in the state, as well as some other stumbles, may have the potential to dull the party's gleam. 

Family First Party Inc


Leader: Unknown

Ideologies: Social Conservatism, Christian Politics

Date Registered: 13/01/2022

Blurb: Born from the ashes of the original Family First (and Bob Day), this iteration of Family First is more of the same. It pushes right-wing Christian ideals above all else, something very clear from its messaging in 2022. That did not make it the most popular party, however, Family First does have a history of doing decently in SA, and did manage to get 3.7% of the vote in the 2022 state election (2.6% in the 2025 Federal Election). Whether this Family First manages to reach the heights its previous iteration did, especially with the Australian Family Party and other right-wing micro-parties around, seems uncertain.  

For Unley


Leader: Ryan Ross Harrison

The first thing you need to know about Ryan Harrison is that he had created his own Wikipedia page, and was proud of that fact (until it got taken down recently). Besides that, Harrison has been a sub-branch president for Labor for two decades and ran in the 2022 city of Unley elections, coming third. He also tried his hand at the 2022 state election, and came less than 3% of the 2PP off from beating David Pisoni for the seat of Unley. Since then though, he has stormed out of the Labor party, claiming that he wasn't pre-selected for 2026 due to 'being the wrong sex'. 

Ideologies: Unley Regionalism

Date Registered: 28/08/2025

Blurb: The party, so far, only has 4 policies, which include 1) a Sports Rec centre for Unley, 2) trialling incentivised tree canopies, 3) having 'a plan' for Unley Rd, 4) upgrading primary schools. It also mentions that it fights for cost of living, land tax reform, and healthcare. In essence, it feels like a local political party that has somehow managed to find itself in state politics. Its name doesn't help, especially when you realise it's meant to be Ryan Harrison For Unley, but with the Ryan Harrison part cheekily left off the actual name. I guess its better than the other party Harrison has registered with the ABN, which is actually called The Other Party. 

Jing Lee - Better Community


Leader: Jing Lee

Jing Lee has been an MLC since 2010, and prior to this year, had been a part of the furniture with the South Australian Liberals. However, after the absolute catastrophe that was the attempted abortion restrictions, an event which saw her become the centre of attention when she voted against a deal made with a Liberal MLC battling breast cancer, allegedly due to threats made against her by anti-abortion campaigner Joanna Howe, Lee left the Liberal party. In doing so, she became an independent MLC, and has started what may be a trend for those to make their own micro-parties.

Ideologies: SA Regionalism

Date Registered: 22/05/2025

Blurb: I won't lie, there is not much to write here. The party does not have a website (an infuriating recurring phenomenon as you'll see), and from what little I can glean from Lee's own site, it may be a 'pro-small/family business' party. More to come as Jing Lee adds more...hopefully. 

Legalise Cannabis South Australia Party


Leader: Unknown

Ideologies: Cannabis Legalisation

Date Registered: 27/01/2022

Blurb: It's Legalise Cannabis, its exactly what it says on the tin. They want to legalise weed. In terms of their chances this election, they got 2% at the 2022 state election (their first one in SA) and 2.86% in the Federal Election (making them the 5th highest party in SA). Looking at it, it seems likely they'll do better, but I do not believe a Legislative Council seat is in their grasp.

Liberal Party of Australia (SA Division)


Leader: Vincent Tarzia

One of the longest-serving Liberals in the state (despite only coming into office in 2014), Tarzia has taken up the mantle of opposition leader with something not dissimilar to a crawl. It's not like Tarzia is unfamiliar with a hard-fought battle, he managed to beat Nick Xenophon for his seat in the 2018 state election, a seat everyone in the state believed Xenophon had won. However, his uptake of the Liberal party leadership has not been especially successful. Having been held in some less obvious ministries and shadow ministries in the last couple years (Minister for police, emergency services and correctional services anyone?), his personal image is just eclipsed by many in the state, none moreso than his opposite in Malinauskas. Tarzia's climb to Premier, if it is even on the table, seems near Herculean. 

Ideologies: Liberal Conservatism, Social Conservatism

Date Registered: 17/10/1985

Blurb: South Australia's Liberal Party is a shambolic mess. There are simply no other words to use. The party was slammed in 2022, and has done little to right its ship since. Recent attempts by federal members, including Alex Antic, to push for the state Liberals to become more right-wing are incredibly out of touch with South Australians, and if successful, will bury the party. Even the recent inclusion of Frank Pangallo seems to have done nothing to stop the bleeding. Will the Liberals get only 2 seats like a recent poll predicted? Unlikely, but I can't see them gaining seats in their current form. 

Libertarian Party SA


Leader: Joel Alexander Hocknell

Unfortunately, Joel is abit of a mystery, lacking much of an online presence or fingerprint. His only active social media is Twitter, but this is telling. His bio includes the phrase 'Liberty or Death', while he has been constantly advocating for 'Castle Doctrine/Law' (the right to use lethal force to defend one's home/property). These two things, plus the fact that he's the president for the SA Libertarians, should be telling enough. But I will keep looking for more information on him.

Ideologies: Libertarianism, Social Conservatism 

Date Registered: N/A

Blurb: The Libertarians are often seen as the ugly stepchild of the right-wing. Not as popular as One Nation or Clive Palmer's many failed parties, but not as niche as the Australian Citizens Party or Great Australian Party, the Libertarians probably have both the most widespread and least successful campaigns of the parties on the right. These days, they are best known for trying to import US-Style gun laws into Australia, while complaining that Gender Identity, Climate Change, and Covid are all conspiracies of some kind.

National Party of Australia (SA) Inc


Leader: Unknown

Ideologies: Conservatism, Agrarianism 

Date Registered: 17/10/1985 

Blurb: South Australia is perhaps the state (besides Tasmania nowadays) where the Nationals are the least relevant 'major' political force. They have never been in a formal coalition with the Liberals, and have not held a single seat in the state since 2010 (they didn't even contest the 2018 election). Their latest iteration did not find success in 2022 either, placing below Family First, One Nation, and the Animal Justice Party. All of this is to say that there isn't much to say about the Nationals, and that they're unlikely to be a major political force in the state for some time.

Pauline Hanson's One Nation


Leader: Carlos Quaremba

Only recently announced (as of August 2025), Carlos Quaremba is not the most well-known politician in Australia. A Councillor for Victor Harbour and the president for the party in SA, Quaremba's platform is essentially just to be anti-Labor and anti-net-zero. Perhaps his biggest claim to fame is showing up in a single episode of Cory Bernardi's "Bernardi" TV Show. Beyond this his political history is lacking, though he has ran for PHON in the 2025 Federal Election and in the 2022 state election (for Barker).

Ideologies: Hansonism, Reactionary Politics

Date Registered: 16/09/2021

Blurb: One Nation is an interesting case in South Australia. Recently brought back into the state for the first time since 2006, PHON did manage to get 2.6% of the vote in the lower house, and over 4% in the upper house, leading to their first MLC, Sarah Game (who we'll talk about in just a second). The party did poorer in the state than it wanted during the Federal election, but it was not an entirely terrible result either. However, that result did cause a massive blow up, with lead candidate/state president Jennifer Game, and the aforementioned Sarah Game, leaving the party over issues we'll also discuss soon. That is major issue for One Nation, as while the Games aren't celebrities, they certainly had more presence than someone like Quaremba. In any case, its the One Nation we all know, they'll spend the next half year preaching about the failures of net-zero while pushing a reaction that most of us don't want to hear.

Sarah Game Fair Go for Australians


Leader: Sarah Game

Sarah Game is not an easy individual to pin down. She was not meant to win her seat in the Legislative Council back in 2022, she literally did no interviews, had no real online presence, and didn't even appear on One Nation's campaign materials (though, if you believe Hanson nowadays, this is because Game was lazy). Since then, she has made a 'name' for herself by not being the most insane One Nation politician to 'grace' this country, but has mostly stayed away from attention. That was, of course, until her and her mother explosively left One Nation. Now, both her and Hanson have their stories over why it happened, but from what I know and understand, One Nation's poor preformance in SA in the federal election had caused issues between Jennifer Game and Hanson who had both expected more from eachother. That blew up, and Sarah left the party alongside her mother.

Ideologies: Social Conservatism 

Date Registered: 24/07/2025

Blurb: Much like Sarah herself, there isn't really much to say about the party. It has an absolutely horrible name, but besides that, there is no party website for me to find policies or even vague thoughts. If one had to guess, this will probably just be One Nation-lite, and considering Game isn't up for re-election this year, I don't know if much effort will be put into the party.

SA Socialists


Leader: Unknown

Ideologies: Socialism, Communism

Date Registered: N/A

Blurb: The South Australian branch of the Victorian Socialists, the SA Socialists, follows many of the same ideas as the original branch. As far-left as they come in Australian politics (if you don't count the SEP), the Socialists are likely to focus on the far-left and left-wing in SA that feels let down by Labor and, less so, the Greens. Whether they do any good will depend on campaign tactics, and whether SA actually has a group of leftists without a home. 

Stephen Pallaras Real Change SA


Leader: Stephen Pallaras

The former Director of Public Prosecutions in the state, Stephen Pallaras is a lawyer (and a Greek) through and through. A simple read of his website makes this very clear. He talks deeply about his time as being a lawyer, calls himself instrumental in the calls for an ICAC, and even says he was known as "the Human Rights Champion of the Pacific". These lofty titles aside, Pallaras is someone with real experience, even if it is really outside of the political realm. Inside the political realm, he does often stumble alongside much larger names than his own.

Ideologies: Centrism, Law and Order

Date Registered: 20/01/2022

Blurb: Lets get this out of the way straight away. I hate the recent addition of Pallaras' name to the party name. His name, realistically, has no additional brand value, and doesn't really add to the name at all. Aside from that though, Real Change SA is a pretty straightforward party. Its policies (and it has them so thats a bonus) are all centred around either cost of living issues like the housing crisis/supermarkets, or are law & order focused such as with specialised domestic violence police units or rape trial reform. Its very much the bog standard 'micro-party thats actually an independent in disguise' meets a criminal lawyer. Will Pallaras win anything? No. But he did nearly get 1% of the vote last election in the upper house, above a couple of other parties, so he might have a role to play.

SA-BEST Incorporated


Leader: Connie Bonaros

One of Nick Xenophon's many political offspring (there's a research article to be written on that), Bonaros is probably one of the people whom that title properly belongs too. Her time in politics has been near entirely connected to Xenophon, having become his advisor in 2006. As such, she was a stalwart with Xenophon's many attempts into politics, and has taken over the party which bears his lineage. More recently Bonaros has been at the forefront of a few issues, including pro-Palestine protests in parliament, supporting the merger of the University of Adelaide and University of South Australia, and, in a bit of politics which I am sure scarred the Hansard forever, pushing for the ban of 'adult' manga and anime in Australia.

Ideologies: Centrism, SA Regionalism

Date Registered: 04/07/2017

Blurb: SA-Best remains heavily tied to the Nick Xenophon parties which came before it. It holds many of Xenophon's old policies, especially his policies around gambling reform which have become a cornerstone of the SA-Best, NXT/Centre alliance-type parties, but also has some different policies around gender equality, fisheries, and young people. Now, SA-Best probably isn't in the best place, having lost over 18% of the total vote between the 2018 and 2022 elections (thats what happens when Xenophon leaves). But one will suspect that Bonaros, whose term expires at the 2026 election, will atleast put up a fight. She will likely be highly relevant in deciding which non-major party 'independent' keeps their seat in the upcoming election, whether it be herself, Jing Lee, or others.

United Voice Australia Party


Leader: Mark Aldridge

Explaining Mark Aldridge is a difficult proposition. An ex-One Nation candidate and an ex-Great Australian Party candidate, Aldridge was one of the Trumpet of Patriots' SA candidates in the 2025 Federal election but resigned from the party before the election actually occurred. He's also previously lost his gun license after making threats to shoot 'hoons'. Hopefully that explains the man, because any more in-depth and we'll be here for a very, very long time. 

Ideologies: Social Conservatism/Unclear

Date Registered: 27/03/2025

Blurb: Firstly, the name is clearly designed to stop both the UAP and Australia's Voice party from registering in South Australia, which is an insanely petty move. Secondly, this party may as well be AI-generated. Its policies are impressively vague, and are designed to seem socially centre-left (well enough to the point where I was initially confused by them). But, when you realise that its Mark Aldridge leading the party, centre-left becomes the last thing you'd call the party. I'll add more here if Mark ever adds anything to his party beyond blurbs that seem like boilerplate political talk, but since the 'media releases' page has said 'coming soon' for months, I don't know if anything will change. 

---------

Pending Applications

This list includes pending applications, currently awaiting ECSA approval

Australian Citizens Party


Leader: Unknown

Ideologies: LaRouchism

Date Registered: N/A

Blurb: The ACP have managed to just sneak their way in to the SA elections (literally, I had to confirm with the ECSA whether they were actually going to be able to finalise their application in time). The rebranded LaRouchists (who claim to not be LaRouchists but contain candidates who all stem from the LaRouchist CEC), the ACP is a stable of Australian elections these days, normally, at the bottom of the results. I doubt much different will occur here, but it will be interesting to see who even runs for them.

----------

Deregistered Parties


This section includes parties that have been deregistered prior to the 2026 state election.


United Multicultural Alliance SA


Leader: Adriana Christopoulos

Adriana Christopoulos is not a name that'll be recognisable to most, and her history is not the same as most on this thread. At one point the chair of the South Australian Multicultural Commission, her website is professionally made and is entirely dedicated to one point, showing that she is dedicated to multiculturalism. There's little more to say about her, but, one must assume her experience as chair of the SAMC has gone into the creation of this party.

Ideologies: Multiculturalism

Date Registered: 07/08/2025

Date DeRegistered: 28/08/2025

Deregistration Reason: Voluntary

Blurb: This is another party where I can give essentially no information. Adriana's website contains no mention of her party nor its policies, and besides the Gazette notice of the party being registered and my posts on Bluesky about it, the party may as well not exist online. One can only assume that the party will have a pro-Multicultralism stance, but how that will look is anyone's guess.

Sunday, August 17, 2025

South Australian 2026 Election - Political Updates Tracker

 Hello all, and welcome to my page dedicated towards tracking the movements of South Australian politics going into the 2026 election. This page, unlike my political party tracker, is meant to generally track changes and moves made by all politicians and hopeful candidates going into the 2026 state election. I'll be updating the page as various things occur, and will be giving my thoughts as well on every change that appears. In addition, I'll provide links to news (both textual and video) regarding each event.


18/10/2025 - More Candidates and Mark Aldridge's new policy


This will be a relatively short update, but another one that I think is quite relevant. To start, Travis Fatchen has announced that he will be running for the seat of Mount Gambier as an Independent. Fatchen's an interesting candidate for a couple reasons. Firstly, he's a big community independent, being a life member of the Mt Gambier Patriots and member of a few other local organisations. Secondly, he was the office manager for Troy Bell since 2014. Now, that second is a major piece of information. He was likely in Bell's inner circle throughout his time as an MP, and so has probably collected much of his connections and network. So on that side, its a plus. However, on the other side, Bell was literally convicted for fraud and theft, and Fatchen was there the entire time. This isn't to say that Bell knew of the crimes, though of course I am sure people will speculate as such, but even if he didn't he's marked by that reputation. Being the long-term office manager to a known criminal MP is not a great mark on one's reputation, and you have to imagine his campaign will look to push his image as a community member above anything else. 

There is a second candidate to discuss, this one being a Labor candidate. Just after Labor randomly dropped 5 candidates, a 6th even more randomly dropped the day after, with even less fanfare. This candidate is Jenn Roberts, and she'll be contesting the seat of Hartley. To note, this means she'll be facing off against Vincent Tarzia, the leader of the Liberal party, and yet she got essentially no fanfare. Not sure that's a good sign for Roberts' chances, but it is the reality. Now, there is scarcely little on her. From what I could find, she is an American expat from Texas, having worked in civil rights/personal lalw in the US. Nowadays, she is the practice manager of Lieschke & Weatherill. That is the law firm founded by Jay Weatherill, the Labor ex-Premier, and a firm which focuses on workers/unions. This is to say that, she likely has a strong legal foundation but I am very unaware about her political experience, besides her supposedly being on Labor's left.

Finally, there is has been a policy announcement by a minor party. That being, the United Voice Australia Party led by Mark Aldridge. Aldridge, on his Instagram and Facebook (but not on the party's social media accounts), stated that, if the UVAP won, they would "seek public ownership of Torrens Island, rebuilt [sic] it to a modern base load plant that can run on our own LPG, coal or any future greener fuel". I'm not going to go into the whole saga of the Torrens Island power stations, but suffice to say, they were meant to be retired this year fully with that being extended to 2028 at the latest. This policy fits Aldridge's anti-net-zero beliefs, but it is also quite weird in its own right. The power stations remaining are very much gas power plants, so to even suggest coal be used, in a state that doesn't mine coal, is either extremely ignorant or just downright insane. At the very least, it shows that the policy isn't the most well-thought-out. It is a policy however, and thats better than half of the minor parties contesting.

Article Links


11/10/2025 - Labor Announces 5 New Candidates

With the resignation of 4 Labor MHAs, it was only a matter of time before the party got around to replacing each of them. And today, in a drop thats only been reported by The Advertiser so far (and only in its physical copy so far), the party has done so, and given us 1 additional candidate, as if it were a treat. In any case, without further ado, I'll put the 5 names below and than go into each of them and give as much detail as I can about each.

* Meagan Spencer for Torrens (replacing Dana Wortley)
* Ella Shaw for Elizabeth (replacing Lee Odenwalder)
* David Wilkins for Lee (replacing Stephen Mullighan)
* Cheyne Rich for Port Adelaide (replacing Susan Close)
* James Rothe for Schubert

Alot to talk about here. Firstly, starting with Spencer, she is/was the Chief of Staff to Claire Scriven, and from what I can tell, has been politically active in the Labor party since atleast 2009. Rumour has it that Spencer was picked against the wishes of Dana Wortley, the MHA she's replacing, and that this was a captain's call by Premier Peter Malinauskas. While such rumours are hard to verify, I will say that this does flow with what I've been hearing more broadly, and so I wouldn't be shocked if they were true. Now, Spencer isn't the only disciple of Scriven's to be selected in this lot. James Rothe, the 20-yr old International Relations student picked for Schubert, is also the Business Support Officer for Scriven. If one wanted to read into this, it seems quite clear that Scriven is gaining alot of influence in SA's Labor party. And considering that she is speaking at the 'Seeking God for South Australia' event being run by the Australian Christian Lobby (she's the only Labor MP doing so), anyone who is for a progressive Labor may have good reason to be anxious.

Beyond Scriven's disciples, there is not too much to say about Rich and Wilkins, atleast. Rich is Malinauskas' Deputy Chief of Staff, and was his campaign director/caucus liaison before that. As such, it seems very clear that Rich's selection into Port Adelaide is a case of the Premier swapping out one ally for another, albeit one who likely owes much of his political 'life' to him. Wilkins, meanwhile, is the Chief of Staff to Chris Picton, and so his selection is probably to do with that.

That leaves Ella Shaw, who is the most interesting out of the lot. Shaw, previously Labor's campaign manager for SA/NT, was named by The Advertiser as one of SA Labor's future leaders alongside the likes of Olivia Savvas, MP for Newlands (and about 3 people I personally know aha). Prior to this though, she was notable for a whole different incident. Back in 2021, she and Ashley Jayasuriya were removed as Board of Directors from the Adelaide University Union (now YouX). The two, who were part of Unity (Labor Right) and Activate (Labor Left) respectively, had "refused to sign declarations swearing they did not leak in-camera information to On Dit" (in-camera information being information discussed at a session that cannot be discussed publicly) and so were removed from the Progress (Liberal) dominated board. Her selection then shows that the latest wave of Student Politics 'hacks' are now entering state politics, something that may be of interest to you all.

Beyond this, there have been some other rumours floating about. Namely, that Justin Hanson, one of Labor's MLCs, was nearly pushed out of the role and given the conciliation prize of being the candidate for Stuart, a seat currently held by Independent MP Geoff Brock with 67.1% of the 2CP. Once again, rumours like these aren't easy to verify, but having talked to Hanson in passing recently, the rumours would make sense with some of the comments he was making at the time. Either way, he apparently fought he was to the #4 spot on the Legislative Council ticket, and so barring a disaster of untold proportions, should retain his spot. All of this does point to the reality that Malinauskas and his allies are looking to turn SA Labor into a machine that can support Malinauskas' 'reign' for a long time to come.

News Articles

None yet, as this has seemingly been only reported in the physical edition of the Advertiser, which I'll put below for now. 

Labor has named five candidates in key seats for next March’s state election, including Premier Peter Malinauskas’s deputy chief of staff Cheyne Rich. He will contest Port Adelaide, now held by former deputy premier Susan Close, who is retiring from politics at the election. Port Adelaide Enfield councillor David Wilkins, who is Health Minister Chris Picton’s chief of staff, will contest the western suburbs seat of Lee – now held by former treasurer Stephen Mullighan, who also is quitting politics. Both candidates were tipped by The Advertiser, as were Meagan Spencer in Torrens and Ella Shaw in Elizabeth, where backbenchers Dana Wortley and Lee Odenwalder are moving on at the election. James Rothe, an international relations and political science student, will take on Liberal health spokeswoman Ashton Hurn in the Barossa-centred seat of Schubert. Mr Malinauskas said the candidates were “part of the next generation of Labor” who would bring “new ideas (and) fresh energy”. He said the candidates were “driven by a genuine desire to make a difference”.


08/10/2025 - More Labor MPs Resign/Will not recontest


Welp, another 2 Labor MPs have stated they will not recontest their seats in the 2026 election. Lee Odenwalder, Member for Elizabeth and the Government Whip, as well as Dana Wortley, Member for Torrens, have announced their intentions to retire from state politics at the election. Both have been MHA's for over 10 years, though neither has served in a major ministerial role. While their resignations may not be as impactful as the Susan Closes and Stephen Mullighans a few weeks prior (see the 19/09/25 update), they may make Labor voters begin to worry that a trend is beginning to appear. It is not a factional exdous, of the 4 politicians Close was the only one from Labor Left (though Wortley was part of those who had defected to the Right only a couple years prior), but it may say something that multiple long-term politicians are looking to retire at the election where Labor is looking to win the most. Of course, they all may just see this as an easy getting off point. If they were tired or done with politics, this election, where Labor pretty much cannot lose, is probably the best choice. However, them leaving at the same time, along with discussions I've had with Labor members and politicians recently, may suggest that many are beginning to grate under the politics of Peter Malinauskas. If this is true, Labor voters worries may have some merit. 

As a side note, this also means we'll need to keep an eye out for who Labor pre-selects for Elizabeth and Torrens.

I wanted to use this update to also note the piece of news which is most annoying to me. That Turning Point Australia (the Australian branch of Turning Point USA) will be expanding its tentacles to South Australia in time for the state election. Most annoyingly to me, this extension will see Turning Point 'SA' running events on university campuses in the same vein as Charlie Kirk did. I do want to note that, on many campuses, the reception that they will recieve is likely to be less than friendly. In any case, Turning Point SA is being led by George-Alexander Mamalis, who, as the news has noted was an "ex-staffer to former environment minister and opposition leader David Speirs, One Nation MLC-turned-independent Sarah Game, and federal Liberal senator Alex Antic." As you can see, some of the best in SA's political scene. Mamalis is also the one running 'The Adelaide Set', a conservative media brand set in SA. He's used it more recently to promote Sarah Game and Henry Davis, so expect to see them (likely Davis) turning up to Adelaide university campuses under the guise of Turning Point. I do want to note that Mamalis went to both the March for Australia and the Charlie Kirk memorial here in Adelaide, something that the news doesn't seem to know or hasn't brought up. Either way, expect some terrible American-style conservative politics in the lead up to the state election.

News Articles



News Clips

7 News (Odenwalder/Wortley resigns)


10 News (Turning Point SA)





05/10/2025 - The SA Socialists join the Public Transport Race

In another sign that this election may be fought on public transport grounds, and that the Labor party is falling woefully behind in this area, the SA Socialists have announced their own public transport policy. This new policy includes making all Adelaide Metro services free, waiving all outstanding fines issued for travelling without a valid ticket, and transitioning Metro services to a 'turn up and go model'. The latter means that, the SA Socialists would see public transport frequencies increased alongside the establishment of a city rail loop, creating a system where passengers can just turn up to their public transport of choice and go to their destination. This, of course, would likely exceed the costings of the Greens public transport policy, itself being the most expensive of the ones put up so far, but would also significantly increase the quality of life for many Adelaideans. In addition, the turn up and go model does exist, atleast on paper, in places like Brisbane, Sydney, and Melbourne, meaning that it would see Adelaide transitioning to a more equal level of public transport as those in the East.

Overall, while it is quite unlikely that the SA Socialists will do major numbers, this policy is almost certainly made to do two things. Firstly, push the other parties to do more. And secondly, show to South Australians there are alternatives on the left. Whether it is successful will be hard to tell. What is easy to tell though, is that, unless Labor does something soon, they are at risk of falling far behind on public transport. 

02/10/2025 - An upgraded Maternity Ward for Murray Bridge's Soldiers’ Memorial Hospital

 Bit of a small update today, but I think talking about independents across SA is just as worthwhile as the other updates focusing on the major parties. Independent candidate for Hammond (the seat which holds Murray Bridge), Airlie Keen, has put forward a petition calling for the winner of the 2026 state election to expand and refurbish the Murray Bridge Soldiers' Memorial Hospital's maternity ward. The petition, with signatures numbering in the hundreds, will likely see Keen bring this forward as a policy at the state election. The expansion is wanted by the hospital's advisory committee, and, according to Murray Bridge News, should be part of the SA Health master plan for the hospital. This, alongside the fact that Liberal MP for Hammond, Adrian Pederick, has also begun pushing for upgrades to the maternity ward, alongside other parts of the hospital, seemingly makes it clear that the maternity ward expansion will be a big part of Hammond's election in 2026, if not a unifying policy across the major candidates.

Now, as I mentioned, this is a small update, and it might seem weird that I'm focusing on such a small area. But, in my opinion, it is important to keep an eye on every part of SA's politics that I can, and update the tracker as things appear on all levels. If this tracker was just a 'major party' news story tracker, I may as well not be writing it. So, as we get closer to the election, expect more of these short updates as smaller parties and candidates write up policies, announce their intention to contend, and otherwise get into the electoral mix.

News Articles

Murray Bridge News | Murray Bridge maternity ward looms as election battleground

01/10/2025 - Are We Finally Having a Public Transport Election?


Hello public transport nerds, the 2026 SA state election might be for you (or it might not be). Hot off the heels of the SA Liberals promising 50c public transport fares, both the Labor party and the Greens have thrown their hats into the public transport ring. First was Labor, who have not gone with a promise, but instead made a change for before the election. Speaking a couple days ago, Premier Peter Malinauskas announced that, for the first time in seven years, a South Australian train timetable was being changed. More specifically, that the Gawler Line's timetable was being updated, and that travel between Gawler and Adelaide would now be 20 minutes shorter. Well, actually, that a person would save 20 minutes every week if they used the line to commute between Gawler and Adelaide. So actually, about 2 minutes in savings per trip, or less if you only use the train occasionally or don't get on/off at Gawler station. Seemingly, some of that creative accounting that the Liberals used for their 50c fares announcement is being used here. However, this is not all. The SA Labor government has announced a sorely needed extension to the Riverlea Park bus service, soon to be one of SA's fastest growing suburbs. I would like it to instead be a new train line, considering that Riverlea Park and the Dry Creek developments will both slam the finished Expressway at the same time, but atleast there's some thought being put in? In any case, Labor had one last tease up its sleeve, with Treasurer Tom Koutsantonis suggesting that they would do whatever they have to go to get "the tram over the bridge", making it seem like the SA Labor government was looking at extending Adelaide's trams to North Adelaide. However, I have it from reputable sources that Labor is aiming for no major transport projects this election, so it may just be hot air.

And that hot air may have been completely stolen by the Greens, as last night, they unveiled their new transport policy, a $759m upgrade to Adelaide's tram network. This includes extending the tram service to North Adelaide (with stops at Adelaide Oval, the Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Archer Street and Piccadilly Cinema) and Norwood (with stops at the corner of Rundle Road and East Terrace, Rundle Street in Kent Town, Sydenham Street, Norwood Oval and Norwood Place). It also includes the potential to extend the tram line to Prospect as well. This, of course, would be a significant transformation of Adelaide's inner city public transport, bringing us, atleast somewhat, in line with other cities in the country. If we consider this, Labor's tease, and that Independent for Adelaide Keiran Snape also holds the policy of extending the tram line, it seems very likely that this election will be fought on public transport lines. And that, in the seat of Adelaide atleast, public transport might be the key issue.

As a complete tangent, I've also noticed that Family First has claimed that they have raised $450,000 nationally as early as June. If this is true, and their claim that they've had 5,500 donaters in SA, it seems that they may have a war purse to use in the state election.

News Articles:





News Clips

10 News


9 News


7 News


ABC


27/09/2025 - Is SA's Labor Party shifting to the right?


Well, this last week has been somewhat low on major political happenings (hence the lack of updates), but there has been a steady stream of news that I should acknowledge. Most notably, in my opinion, Labor's shift to the right, and the mild disasterclass of a week they've had.

If you've kept up with this tracker, you'll know that SA Labor is in a weird place, having had Susan Close and Stephen Mullighan both announce their retirements at the upcoming election. Well it seems their retirement has caused a shift to occur. This started earlier in the week, when Premier Peter Malinauskas went to the National Energy Forum. There, he gave a speech on the Narrabri gas expansion in New South Wales, supporting it and stating that "if there's gas out there, this is the time to get it out of the ground". He also labelled those who opposed the gas expansion, and gas production as "eco-purists who fill Instagram with creeds", suggesting that anyone who believes that the country can transition to net zero without natural gas is ignorant or an idiot. This is, glaringly, a big shift in rhetoric from a Premier whose campaign rested on pushing for net zero through hydrogen, and whose state is currently suffering from an algal bloom whose cause is, amongst other things, climate change. 

Now, this one speech probably would have been water off a duck's back if it weren't for newly re-minted Treasurer Tom Koutsantonis. In an interview with The Australian, Koutsantonis talked about how he was worried about "that type of woke agenda", meaning the championing of politically 'correct' issues that 'drive young men to the right'. This is, once again, a shift in rhetoric from the party whose previously been happy to walk the line between progressivist and centrist. However, its not entirely new, as Malinauskas had said similar only a month ago (see the 21/08/2025 update). What is perhaps new is Koutanstonis essentially coming straight out and saying that "The Labor Party in South Australia is a lot more centrist than other political parties around the country... What you will see from me is an accurate reflection of the Premier’s will – a stable, no surprises government that is unashamedly pro-business and unashamedly labour. A more traditional Labor Party. The one your Dad would recognise." For anyone in South Australia still wondering if SA's Labor Party is still left-wing, the Treasurer has your answer. I also suggest that Koutsantonis read a history book, since unless he's talking about his dad, most younger Labor voters parent's would think of the Whitlam and Dunstan years, which, amongst many things, were eras of social change wrought by Labor party leaders. Also, both men are probably spinning in their graves hearing Koutsantonis call traditional Labor 'pro-business'. 

In anycase, its genuinely not been a good week for anyone who still wants to pretend SA Labor government is 'progressive' and 'left-leaning'. Beyond this, there have been a few other things of note that have happened. The SA Young Liberals may, in leaked documents, seemingly decide to back mandated drug testing for state MPs and also push for Medicare to be scrapped. So y'know, its not like the Liberals are doing any better right now. Also, back to the Treasurer for a second, Koutsantonis has essentially said the Labor government won't be promising any ambitious spending at the next election (aka, don't expect to see any big transport/infrastructure/housing policies). 

To end, I did also want to note that the Australian Citizens Party has applied for registration in SA, and after a quick check with the ECSA on this, it seems that their application can be finalised before the election as they just met the deadline. So, with that being the case, it seems we will have 18 parties contesting the state election, with the La Rouchists (who claim not to be LaRouchists) being one of them.

News Articles

Sky News | South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas lashes ‘eco-purists’ over opposition to gas expansion





22/09/2025 - 50c public transport, the promise that never fails


In decently big news over the weekend, the Liberal Party in SA has announced a new election policy, promising to bring 50c public transport fares to South Australia. This is part of their new transport policy plan, which would see $240m invested to boost commuter numbers. It also includes a promise to extend the Adelaide Metro bus services to Murray Bridge, and add additional on-demand bus services to regional centres such as Victor Harbor. The keynote promise of 50c public transport fares has made waves in the news, as it is the first good choice the SA Liberals have made in the last couple years.

Now, I do feel compelled to mention that the Liberals aren't even the first party in the state to present this policy. The Greens, back in April, did so as well, following pushes by the Adelaide City Council. So y'know, if anyone ever tells you the Greens ambitious policies do nothing, I guess point here? In any case, all of them were obviously piggybacking off Queensland Labor and Steven Miles, who took 50c fares into the 2024 Queensland Election as a key policy that they had actually already started. The policy was picked up by the Liberal party that won the election, and is part of why Miles' Labor managed to loss the election with some dignity, versus the landslide that was expected to happen to them.

With that in mind, Labor's response in SA may have you scratching your head. Peter Malinauskas has said that the Liberal's plan is missing $75 million dollars worth of funding (which sounds more like a poor excuse from him than anything else), and claims that it actually increases the cost for students. He gets this in a technicality, as the current 28 day pass for students technically equals 25 cents per ride, if you take public transport 2 times a day, 5 times a week. Mind you, I don't know any highschooler who uses the 28 day pass, as most just use their Metro card, and so its an incredibly weak technicality. At the same time, to be fair, Vincent Tarzia's claim that the change will save the average SA family up to $100 a month is also a technicality, only happening if all 4 people in the family (two adults and two students) use the bus every day, twice a day. This is not really a scenario I see playing out anywhere, so both sides are doing some funky business when it comes to whose saving what.

On a more serious note, I do think it is a mistake for Labor to have essentially rejected matching this promise, and it may be the first serious error Malinauskas has done since becoming opposition leader. Now, this is likely because he was already on unsteady feet due to the events of last week (read that chaos below), but it is a mistake nonetheless. While most voters with some historical memory will be hard-pressed to believe that the SA Liberals will actually go through with this promise, considering how they sold off public transport in the past, optics are important and this is something Malinuaskas knows well. Not matching what is a clearly popular promise, and a policy that has been shown to help increase the dreary prospects of interstate parties, may see the Liberals gain some ground. Now, it won't be enough, but unless Malinauskas and Labor can come together and provide their own policies with ambition within them, they may actually see their massive lead shrink somewhat. At the very least, they may not win all but two seats in the state as previous polls have suggested.

As a small aside, Pangallo is still facing backlash over his use of AI in regards to the algal bloom. And so, while Tarzia may have gotten some unexpected wins here, he's still under the pump over 'the watchdog's' position in the Liberals. One more mistake by Pangallo, and all of these small wins will be quickly trampled by the need to find a new candidate for Waite.

News Articles

ABC | SA opposition promises to slash public transport fares to 50 cents, if elected next year





News Clips

7 News


9 News


ABC


19/09/2025 - Peter Malinauskas has shuffled his cabinet, lets see whose gone where


So, coming off the retirement announcements of Susan Close and Stephen Mullighan, Peter Malinauskas has decided to undertake a full cabinet shuffle. While we are only 6 months out, and most of the new ministers won't get much time to enact much change, their new positions are telling. Should Malinauskas and Labor win the upcoming election, and that seems very likely, it is possible these positions now are a 'dry run' for a potential cabinet in 2026.

In any case, here are the changes;

- Tom Koutsantonis, MP for West Torrens → Treasurer

- Kyam Maher, Legislative Councillor → Deputy Premier

- Emily Bourke, Legislative Councillor → Minister for Infrastructure and Transport

- Blair Boyer, MP for Wright → Minister for Police

- Joe Szakacs, MP for Cheltenham → Minister for Industry, Innovation, and Science

- Rhiannon Pearce, MP for King → Minister for Emergency Services and Correctional Services & Minister for Recreation, Sport, and Racing

- Lucy Hood, MP for Adelaide → Minister for Climate, Environment, and Water

- Katrine Hildyard, MP for Reynell → Minister for Women & Minister for Domestic, Family, and Sexual Violence

On top of this, Malinauskas has taken the portfolio of defence and space industries for himself. Now, the shuffle has occasioned criticism from the Liberals, specifically Josh Teague, whose taken issue at a new minister being given the environmental portfolio, and Koutsantonis becoming treasurer again (he was last it between 2014-2018 under Weatherill). While I can't comment much on Hood's appointment one way or another, I assume Koutsantonis was given the position so that he could spend even more time ragging on the Liberals and specifically Pangallo to the media. I could be wrong but it also seems to be everything he does these days, so?

Either way, this is likely the cabinet that'll lead SA into the next election, barring any major controversies. It does leave one question though, who will Labor pre-select to replace Close and Mullighan in their seats of Port Adelaide and Lee. I will keep an eye out for their replacements, which I hope will be soon. 

News Articles

ABC | Tom Koutsantonis appointed SA Treasurer after Stephen Mullighan and Susan Close step down

The Advertiser | Tom Koutsantonis to replace Stephen Mullighan as Treasurer, full cabinet revealed as Susan Close steps down


News Clips

7 News


9 News


ABC


18/09/2025 - Susan Close and Stephen Mullighan retire and Sarah Game continues to hate abortions


The South Australian political landscape got hit with a large blow today as the Deputy Premier, Susan Close, and the Treasurer, Stephen Mullighan, have announced their retirements. More specifically, Peter Malianuaskas announced it for them out of nowhere, but tomato tomato. The two have given details on why they are retiring, Mullighan to spend more time with his young family, and Close as she's felt she has given everything she can to public life and wants more freedom. To be fair to them both, those are valid reasons, but they have left Malinauskas scrambling. In perhaps a rare bit of vulnerability for the premier, he stated that "was really disappointed by it. I like to think every now and then I can persuade people to do things. I was completely unable to persuade them to stick around despite my best efforts. So naturally, I’m really sad to be losing them both". If you read between the lines, it seems very clear that Malinauskas does not think this is the right move for them, his government, or the Labor party, and for a political operator whose normally on top of it all, it does seem to have him abit shaken.

One man whose trying to capitalise on this is Liberal leader Vincent Tarzia. He's come out swinging, claiming that the wheels have fallen off the Labor government, that Close and Mullighan are abandoning ship, and, not using a cliche this time, that the government used these announcements to hide bad ABS data about SA. The last one seems like an incredible reach, but this is the closest Tarzia's has come to a win in months, so he's taking it. He further claimed that the "veneer" had come off Malinauskas, which might be true but it doesn't mean he's gained one himself. In any case, it seems very likely that he'll ride this wave for a long while, if oonly to distract from Frank Pangallo running into every rake in the yard.

Now, we were apparently meant to get the full details of the cabinet reshuffle tomorrow, but half of it has either been leaked or announced today, so I figure I may as well say it here. Kyam Maher, attorney-general and leader of the government in the Legislative Council, has been sworn in as Deputy Premier. Alongside him, Member for Adelaide Lucy Hood and Member for King Rhiannon Pearce were made ministers in cabinet, while Member for Elder Nadia Clancy was made an assistant minister. Maher, chief of the labor left faction in the state, is an interesting choice considering Tom Koutsantonis' existence, but I suspect Koutsantonis doesn't want any additional responsibility and is just enjoying his role mocking Pangallo. Either way, if there's more to be said about it tomorrow, I will update this tracker.

While this may have taken over the news today, another news story has been bubbling away at the surface. As has been mentioned previously, Sarah Game has been pushing for a new anti-abortion bill, and has finally produced it in the Legislative Council. She also held an anti-abortion rally alongside Dr Joanna Howe on parliament steps, to show that this isn't just a PR move as she has been accused of. Interestingly, Keiran Snape, Independent candidate for Adelaide, was nearby criticising them and otherwise being against the rally. Based on his social media, it seems hes taken a pro-abortion stance against Game and Howe. 

Either way, Game has stated that she believes the bill will pass through the Legislative Council, and if it should, that she will push for it to be voted on by the lower house before the election. Now, I'm not certain she either has the power or that the bill will actually pass, but atleast she's confident? In any case, she also had a go at the Liberal party, particularly Tarzia, over making this vote a conscience vote rather than a strict vote for it as per the party line. She went so far as to call the Liberal's "wussy" over it, showing you that even a Legislative Councillor isn't below using terms you'd hear on a year 3's playground. And, I don't know if she knows this, but Tarzia has never really been anti-abortion, so he er attempts at baiting him (I think) probably won't work. Either way, this will likely be a continuing story until the bill either passes or is killed once again.

News Articles









News Clips

7 News


9 News


ABC


17/09/2025 - Frank Pangallo's AIGate


Two '-gate' controversies in just under a month, Frank must be gunning for a record. This time, ol' watchdog Frank Pangallo has gotten himself into hot water after using artificial intelligence to generate academic sources for his claims that SA's desalination plant has a part to play in the algal bloom crisis. He claims it was a mistake done when he was trying to fetch a list of academic articles to show to the Budget and Finance Committee, while Labor says it was a deliberate attempt to mislead parliament and people alike.

Starting up yesterday, it came to light that Pangallo had provided the Budget and Finance Committee with research showing that the desalination plant was likely a factor in the algal bloom. Now, this has been a theory (and conspiracy theory) that has remained popular throughout South Australia, even though there is no evidence for it. It's often used by people who want to deny climate change's role in the bloom, but others use it to show that the desalination plant, built under a Labor government and whose production was increased by Malinauskas in January 2025, is a mistake to have around, No matter Frank's motivation, he was attempting to peddle something less than scientifically accurate.

In any case, Labor had attempted to contact the authors, only to be told by one that they had never written the paper cited. This spiralled, with The Advertiser stating that only two from the list of five authors could be contacted at all. From here, Pangallo and Hood both claimed it was an administrative error, that something had gone wrong with the citations but that they did exist. Now, for anyone with a keen eye or whose in education, even from this point AI seemed like the likely culprit. Tom Koutsantonis, smelling blood in the water, began calling for Pangallo to apologise and resign from the parliamentary committee over this. And for many, that was where we thought it would end. Pangallo would deny any misconduct, suggest it was a simple mistake, and things would continue.

Today though, things changed. Confronted by reporters from the major networks at his office door, Pangallo has admitted to using AI, though he claims it was still simply a mistake. He stated that, he had already done the research on the papers, and just used AI to get a "list of authors or whatever", and was given the wrong information. Whether the true reason or not that this occurred, its very clear that Pangallo is in hot water. The Liberal Party, including Tarzia, have done their best to stick by him, but this may be a bridge to far. The dilemma comes now over whether it is worse to sack your 'star' candidate 6 months out from the big game, or keep them knowing that they are an absolute wrecking ball. Neither option does not seem exciting for a Liberal Party already on its knees as it enters the state election.

Koutsantonis, atleast, seems to believe there is only one option. He's stated that Tarzia needs to sanction Pangallo and remove him from the Committee, noting that "if any serious or professional researcher did this, they'd be sacked!". I guess time will tell whether AIGate will sink Pangallo, or if the watchdog can hold on once more.

News Articles




News Clips

7 News



14/09/2025 - The Liberal Bunch; or who the Liberals have pre-selected for the Legislative Council


Interesting news coming out today as we have learnt which candidates the Liberal party will be putting forward for the Legislative Council. To not bury the lede, the candidates are as follows;

  1. Ben Hood MLC
  2. Heidi Girolamo MLC
  3. Rowan Mumford
  4. Thea Hennessey
  5. Kanwaldeep/KD Singh
  6. Belinda Crawford-Marshall
These 6 will lead the statewide charge come campaign season, but you have to think that in the current state of the Liberal party's polling, even Hennessey, sitting at the normally 'comfortable' 4th spot, will be anxious about her chances. It should be noted that this pre-selection was not without its troubles. The Advertiser reported that Alex Antic, the far-right powerbroker of the Liberal party, had put up his own pre-selection ticket for the Legislative Council. This ticket included Hood at no.1, Hennessey 2nd, Playford Mayor Gleen Docherty 3rd, Crawford-Marshall 4th, and Girolamo (a sitting MLC) all the way down at 5th. His ticket was opposed by the 'Conservative ticket', which had Hood and Girolamo at the top, and then recommended voters preference Crawford-Marshall, Mumford, Hennessey, and Docherty in any order they prefer. As you can see, the Conservatives got the best of it in the end, with their top 2 picks going forward as well as their choice in Mumford. The Advertiser, interestingly, has described this as a spurning, but in my opinion it really is just showing a federal Senator that he can't run roughshod over a state party.

In any case, let's have a look at some of the candidates. Hood and Girolamo are obviously easy to find information on, being incumbent MLCs. Hood, the co-creator of children's book/TV character George the Farmer, has been an MLC since 2023, having been a fill-in for the vacancy caused by Stephen Wade's retirement. Hood's 2 years of sitting have been controversial, as he was the one to introduce the ban on late-term abortions which failed, and that was pushed by Dr Joanna Howe. It should also be noted that Hood, prior to becoming an MLC, failed to win the seat of Mt Gambier against convicted fraudster and thief Troy Bell in 2022. Girolamo was also appointed to the Legislative Council to fill a casual vacancy, caused by the resignation of David Ridgway. Previously a client manager for Deloitte for 12 years across 2 stints, and the treasurer of Kidsafe SA, both she and Hood stem from the right-wing faction of the SA Liberals. 

Moving on from the sitting candidates, we get to Rowan Mumford. Mumford is abit more of a mystery to me, but I know his political timeline quite well. Mumford's two biggest claims to fame are being a former state party president, and the candidate for Kavel in the 2022 election, a result he lost by a landslide to Dan Cregan (seeing a 26.4% primary vote swing against him). It was also rumoured by InDaily that he and now-Sarah Game Fair Go for Australia Legislative Council candidate Henry Davis were part of the pre-selection battle for Mayo in the lead-up to the 2025 election. If he were, he also lost that pre-selection battle to Zane Basic. Either way, Mumford's record is not the shiniest of them all. Now, he is joined by Crawford-Marshall and Hennessey, whom I won't go into too much detail on as I've already covered them both extensively. If you're interested, check out the update on the 25th of August 2025. For a brief overview, Crawford-Marshall believes in chemtrails, and Hennessey believes that through the power of prayer she once cured lactose intolerance. 

And that leaves us with KD Singh. The only 'moderate' Liberal pre-selected on the list, Singh is essentially in a horror spot, as the Liberal party will need to see significant gains for him to be elected (but without it being as impossible as 6th). Singh, who recently got featured in an article by The Australian (shudder), is the owner/leader of multiple businesses, including being the managing director of financial advisory firm Money Merchants Financial Service, and the owner/operator of Brice Hill Country Lodge, a tourism property in the Clare Valley. Singh also notes himself as a 'financial coach' on his resume, as well as a 'builder and developer', though provides no examples of what projects he has apparently led in 'sustainable building and community housing'. He also notes his extensive community leadership roles, including being a Governing Council Member of Adelaide High School. In any case, if this were a Liberal party not captured by the right, you'd almost expect Singh to be an ideal candidate and higher up on the list. The Australian essentially implies that, as he is looking to be the first Indian MLC in SA's history, he could be a salve to a party struggling with its image to Indian voters after Jacinta Price's messaging and the March for Australia. His being 5th, below Hennessey and Mumford, is telling of a party that is in factional disarray.

News Articles



08/09/2025 - Pop Quiz! Which Better Suits Salt Flats, 15,000 Houses or a Golf Course?


In a bizarre shift for South Australian Politics, the major parties have become embroiled in a debate on how best to use the Dry Creek salt flats. For a while now, Labor has touted its efforts to rezone the area for 15,000 houses, in an attempt to address Adelaide's housing crisis. This policy, divisive amongst South Australians, has become the target on a new feud between the Liberals and Labor. Two weeks back, newly minted Liberal Frank Pangallo was discussing the North Adelaide golf course redevelopment and LIV Golf, and while he did so, stated that "There’s a greenfield site at Dry Creek that the government could take over tomorrow and build one very quickly, in three years they can have it done". 

Now, this statement pretty much flew under the radar for the last two weeks, with no one I know even thinking about it. However, I assume some Labor staffers turned back to it, as today Labor has come out in full force, lambasting the idea. Housing Minister Nick Champion went as far as to call it "a fantasy", ridiculing Pangallo for even bringing it up. Now, I want to bring this to your attention because it is emblematic of the current state of SA's two major parties. The Liberals, confused and at eachother's throats, continually stumble when attempting to make political points. Pangallo here was obviously trying to state that you could go anywhere for LIV Golf, so there needs to be more reason given to the public over the choice of North Adelaide (which isn't an unfair statement). However, he put his foot in his throat when he chose a major housing development, and gave Labor political ammunition while poorly explaining his point. Labor, for their part, did what they are undeniably good at, and have turned the statement into a 'political row' designed to make the Liberals seem ridiculous. Because what seems more insane than houses on salt flats? A golf course on salt flats.

Overall, I don't expect this to affect state politics much, but it really demonstrates the ongoing pattern here. The Liberals, even if they have good points, aren't able to articulate them, and Labor, a cohesive and united party, are simply running circles around them. This row is symptomatic of what we will likely see in spades come the proper election campaign.

News Articles


News Clips

7 News


9 News


06/09/2025 - Sarah Game Enters SA's Ongoing Abortion Saga & Nicolle Flint Goes to War with Tony Pasin


Been a few days since we needed an update, but I've decided now is a good time to add one in. Ex-One Nation MLC and current leader of Sarah Game's Fair Go for Australia party, Sarah Game, has taken up the anti-abortion crusade less than a year after the debacle caused by Ben Hood's attempt. Standing alongside anti-abortion campaigner Dr Joanna Howe, whom we should all remember was banned from parts of SA's Parliament over her efforts to threaten and intimidate MPs (including ex-Liberal MLC Jing Lee), Game announced her introduction of a new bill which would place limits on abortions after 23 weeks. In summary, the bill seeks to remove the clause allowing abortion after that limit if the pregnancy would (with the approval of two doctors) lead to "significant risk" for the mother's mental/physical health, and instead only allow late-term abortions if it was to save a life or if the fetus risked significant 'abnormalities'. 

Howe and Game have both labelled the bill as a sensible way to protect the rights of babies, however, as ex-Greens MLC Tammy Franks has noted, this is quite clearly a "conservative dogwhistle". Howe campaigns against abortion far beyond the scope of this bill, and so its hard to believe her attempts will stop here even if she is successful. It should also be noted that Hower helped draft both this and Hood's bill, and so despite her being banned in parts of Parliament, her influence is still strong. Furthermore, as Franks has also noted (thanks for stealing all my analysis from me), it is also a "bid for votes". In essence, Game is attempting to increase her and her party's notoriety in the state before the election occurs, using an issue that will get TV, Radio, and coffee shop talk to get her name out there. Mind you, this is failing as both The Advertiser and the ABC have only noted her as an ex-One Nation MLC turned Independent, not even bothering to mention her party in the introduction of their articles. 

In any case, the bill, if voted on, will likely be one which does not follow party lines, as MLCs are provided the ability to 'vote with their conscience'. For anyone who needs reminding, the previous vote along the same lines saw Labor MLCs Clare Scriven and Tung Ngo, alongside newly minted Liberal Frank Pangallo vote for the bill, while SA Best's Connie Bonaros voted against it. The other votes fell as you may expect. It is likely that this bill will also not pass, as the number of MLCs voting against does not seem likely to change, but I will keep an eye on it over time.

Now, a few other things occurred over the last couple days that should be noted. Firstly, Alex Antic was off in Federal Parliament doing his best to imply conspiracy around the National Socialist Network. Antic, essentially the main powerbroker of the SA Liberals, stated that the NSN "seems like they're straight out of central casting". He'd go further, complaining about the media labelling the group as 'far-right' even though they have socialist in their name (I'm sure that Antic also believes North Korea is Democratic), before noting that they aren't the "face-tattooed overweight men like we’ve come to accept". I won't go too in-depth, as its obvious that Antic is being deliberately disingenuous while also comparing the NSN to biker gangs with connections to Nazis, but Australia's far-right have a history of being clean cut and 'professional' whenever they come together as a political group rather than something else. If I didn't know that Antic was purposefully being obtuse, I'd have to question his understanding of basic Australian right-wing political history (tbh I do question it anyways).

Speaking of Nazis, Mark Aldridge's saga with the March continues. He has continually distanced himself from the NSN who showed up in Adelaide, claiming that he did not want them there and had no power to stop them (despite them making it very clear that they both were going to be there for weeks and that they had a hand in leading the March), and has essentially been going through a significant amount of damage control. At the same time, him and Bec Freedom (who claims Annie Marlow was the real organiser) have been going at it on Instagram and Twitter over who actually organised the event. Its spectacularly entertaining to watch play out. All of this hasn't stopped Mark from claiming to be the organiser of a new March, titled "Australia Unites Against Government Corruption", which is apparently planned for September 13th 'nationwide' (at Rundle Park at 12pm in Adelaide). It seems that Mark has double-booked himself on this day, as he also plans to attend an anti-Nazi First Nations rally at Victoria Square (he does actually support Indigenous Sovereignty interestingly enough), and I imagine this fact will not go over well with the people who go to the AUAGC March. In any case, I cannot wait to watch how this one spectacularly crashes and burns. 

BREAKING NEWS: As I was writing this, a whole new development occurred that I need to talk about. The Advertiser just broke that Nicolle Flint, ex-Liberal MP for Boothby, is planning on fighting Tony Pasin for pre-selection for the seat of Barker. Such a move is clear evidence of the party's ongoing factional struggles, but one also has to imagine it is a move of sheer desperation from Flint. Having failed at the 2025 Federal Election to regain her seat, going head-to-head with an opposing faction's most prominent powerbroker seems to be Flint testing whether she can regain some control of the party. If Flint tries and fails to be pre-selected against Pasin, I would not be shocked to see her leave the party entirely and either stand as an independent or build her own micro-party. Only time will tell though. 

News Articles






02/09/2025 - No By-Election for Mount Gambier


A short update today, but one that is nonetheless quite pertinent. This is a follow-up on the Troy Bell/Mt Gambier saga thats played out over a couple updates, so be sure to check those out below if you haven't. In any case, it has been revealed today that Bell's resignation will not be leading to a by-election for the Electoral District of Mount Gambier. Speaker Leon Bignell noted that the cost of running a by-election, alongside the fact that anyone elected would only represent the district for 6-8 days in parliament prior to the actual state election, meant that running a by-election was impractical.

This has caused Liberal member for Barker, Tony Pasin, to go on what could be considered a tyrade against Premier Malinauskas (even though he is not the one who decides whether a by-election is held). I'll let you read it in the SE Voice, but its very clear that Pasin, and the Liberals, want to make this a fight. This is abundantly clear with the statement, "failure to heed this call is proof positive the Premier wants to govern for Adelaide whilst simultaneously offering the regions nothing but lip service."

In the terms of the upcoming state election, this leaves the political parties in a very interesting spot. With no elected representative for another 6 months, there is good room for pre-selected candidates to make a brand of themselves by simply being seen throughout the community. As such, it seems likely that both major parties, and perhaps even the Greens, will begin pushing their candidates, as a way to get them well-known before the election occurs. Only time will tell though.

News Articles






31/08/2025 - Mark Aldridge leads March for Australia in Adelaide


So, only one small update today, but worth noting nonetheless. The first, and most relevant, is that Mark Aldridge, leader of the United Australia Voice Party, has been confirmed as an organiser of Adelaide's 'March for Australia'. When asked about it by the ABC, Mark stated, "It's not anti-migration. The general consensus here is mass immigration, it's just not the right time. The way we're struggling with housing, the way we're struggling with hospital beds and everything else. Whilst there's not enough homes, not enough resources, I think we need to temper migration down and then have a national conversation as adults about the continuation of migration figures."

As anyone can tell you, these are not factual statements, and that Adelaide's very real health and housing crises are based on other systemic issues, not immigration. It should be noted that Adelaide's march descended into chaos as those within it seemingly rejected the arrival of the National Socialist Network, though its unknown whether Mark was aligned with their arrival/had invited them. What should be noted is that, throughout the March, multiple people could be seen wearing shirts with Aldridge's party logo on them. Seemingly than, Mark (who I've been told moonlights as a dodgy car salesmen on Facebook) utilised this event to essentially 'soft launch' his party. Considering how his party's site is devoid of information or policies, this is the first solid thing we can point to, beyond Mark's torrid past in far-right politics, that demonstrates where the party will lie on the political spectrum.

I should also note that a few other ex-political candidates showed up at the march. This includes Mark Neugebauer, Australian Federation Party candidate for Mayo in the 2022 Federal election, and Jacob Van Raalte, Liberal Democrat candidate for Mayo in that same election. If any more show up, I will be sure to alert you, though any larger politicians like Alex Antic, Sarah Game, or Carlos Quaremba all seem to have avoided the March. 

Unfortunately, there is no links to provide to this, however, there are a few photos of Mark and his party's shirts. 

Mark Aldridge at the March

The United Voice Australia logo appearing at the March

28/08/2025 - Troy Bell, MP for Mt Gambier, resigns from Parliament


Ex-Liberal MP Troy Bell has resigned from state parliament today, after his appeals against his convictions for theft and fraud amounting to over $430,000 were quashed. Bell, who had been found guilty of 20 counts of theft and 5 counts of 'dishonestly dealing with documents', had remained an active MP after having been found guilty, having been awaiting the outcome of his appeal hearing. His resignation does not come as an exact shock, rather, it is logically impossible that he could continue in his role should his sentencing include jail time. 

However, his resignation does put the state into a bit of a bind. With the 2026 state election only 7 months away, there is difficulty in knowing whether a by-election will occur to replace Bell. Premier Malinauskas, when asked, stated that such a decision will be made by Speaker Leon Bignell under the advice of the ECSA. He did note that the current calendar, close to the end of the parliamentary sitting year and containing school holidays which often do not include by-elections, did not leave much room for one to occur. In my opinion, it seems unlikely that a by-election will occur, as the candidate elected would only hold the role for a couple months at most before preparations for the election started. In any case, this does take Bell out of the running for the 2026 election, and leaves Mt Gambier very open for both the Labor and Liberal parties.

News Clips





27/08/2025 - Game On for Fair Go Candidates 


Got some interesting updates for the trackers today (please ignore the absolute horror show of a title, its the best pun I could think of lmao). One is a proper update of candidates, and the other is technically a few months old but just came to my attention, so enjoy that.

The first, and the proper update, is that Sarah Game's Fair Go for Australia party (horrific party name) has announced two candidates for the state election. Coming off the back of former Liberal party veteran Henry Davis joining as their lead Legislative Council candidate, the party has announced that Angela Rojas will join him, while Jake Hall-Evans will run for the seat of Colton. Rojas is perhaps the lesser-known figure of the two politically, being the co-founder of the International Coalition4Children, a Christian Conservative group which promotes the 'child safety' and the 'parental voice' over governments and teachers having a say on a child's "morality, ethics and identity". Put plainly, she is obviously for opposing LGBT+ rights, as we can see by her attempts to undertake a petition around "classification and borrowing conditions for 'pornographic' children's books in libraries and school", which is very much a dogwhistle for books which discuss gender and sexuality. 

Jake Hall-Evans, on the other hand, is likely a name politics hacks in SA have heard of. He was the Liberal candidate for Hindmarsh in the 2019 Federal Election and their candidate for Lee in the 2022 State election, losing both of those to Labor. He also ran in the 2025 election as an independent for Hindmarsh, receiving only 1.6% of the vote and beating only the Animal Justice Party and FUSION. Despite these setbacks, he was obviously trusted enough at one point by a not-yet-dead Liberal party to be their candidate, and so must have some political acumen. Hall-Evans claims that he joined 'Fair Go' as it focused on "real people" and "pragmatic outcomes", words we've all heard before in regards to parties such as One Nation, UAP, or Trumpet of Patriots. In any case, he is probably the most well-known name on the party's list right now, and that includes an MLC and a Councillor. Whether his name brand can help him win a seat he's never contested, for a new party that is a split off from One Nation, seems very unlikely.

We also learnt a couple of other things about 'Fair Go' today. These include some potential policies, which range from the mundane, such as "incentivising landlords to put solar panels and batteries on their homes", to the controversial, including "repealing the First Nations Voice to Parliament". Game also noted that the party would be focusing on "putting parents back in charge of how their kids are educated" an obvious dogwhistle that the party will look to demonise modern education around gender, sexuality, and likely history/society as well. Finally, it seems that the party's slogan is going to be 'Game On', which is unfortunately not horrible. 

Moving on, we find ourselves at the 'retro update', which is about a candidate who stepped forward a few months ago but who slipped under my radar until today. This section is abit of a look at their candidacy, as I think it might be quite relevant for the election.

The aforementioned candidate is ex-Greens member Keiran Snape, an Adelaide City Councillor who left the Greens over being unable to run for them. Specifically, he was disallowed from running in their upper house campaign as he still worked for Tammy Franks, the ex-Greens MLC who left the party with some controversy. Snape, a Councillor for 4 years and the Deputy Mayor in 2024, is planning to run as an independent for Adelaide, He’ll be facing strong opposition from Labor’s ____, but with endorsements from Franks, as well Adelaide’s cult classic Rex “FOI Warrior” Patrick, he’s got backing that most other independents won’t have.

In addition, his platform is one which will likely find significant support across North Adelaide and Prospect. Notably, he has attacked the Festival Tower and LIV Golf plans (the favourite punching bags of those in the electoral division’s wealthier area), while also proposing plans to make the Adelaide parklands both state heritage listed and even go for a UNESCO World Heritage bid. Furthermore, he’s also promising a favourite policy of transport nerds across Adelaide, a tram extension across to North Adelaide. These policies, local and targeted to a specific demographic, will likely find a cult classic, and it is possible that Snape will find himself in the 2 candidate preferred race if the Liberals continue to implode. However, I am unsure that even the most targeted policies will be able to beat a surging Labor who holds the hearts and minds of many of the Adelaide Division’s non-northern residents. 

News Articles



25/08/2025 - Frank Pangallo becomes the Lorax while the Liberal pre-selection potentials claim to be the cure for lactose intolerance


The last two days have been relatively slow in terms of news, however, there were a few things that went on for me to discuss here. From chainsaw-wielding politicians, to pre-selection potentials who believe they can use prayer to heal lactose intolerance, even a slow news period in SA is still a fun one.

Starting with Frank Pangallo, the newly minted Liberal has already gone on the attack, setting his eyes on a common target for many across the state, LIV Golf. A sporting event which has already gotten pushback due to its redevelopment plans, Pangallo has gone all in on the claim that LIV Golf's redevelopment will do irreparable damage to the Adelaide Parklands. Specifically, he has claimed that it will take down over 5400 trees from the 9000 across the current golf courses, something Pangallo says will be action "South Australians have not seen before". 

Frank Pangallo holding a chainsaw
Frank "I'm the Lorax and I speak for the trees" Pangallo

These claims have earned Pangallo the ire of Infrastructure and Transport Minister Tom Koutsantonis, who often feels like Premier Peter Malinauskas' own attack dog these days. Koutsantonis (commonly referred to as Kouts) noted that the government did not yet have a number for how many trees would be removed, but claimed that the Liberals number was a lie. He'd go even further than that though, stating that "I’m prepared to go as far as to say that if this number is accurate, I’ll resign." In my opinion, Koutsantonis (SA's longest running MP at just under 28 years) is simply giving himself an easy out to retirement. If Pangallo's claim is true, he gets to retire quickly and easily. If not, he gets to laugh at Frank. Now, I may be joking, but funnier things have happened in SA.

Now, things only continue to get worse for Liberals as a 'scoop' by the Daily Mail UK of all places has shown that one of their pre-selection hopefuls might not be the most representative candidate. Thea Hennessy, a small business owner and campaign manager for Zane Basic (the Liberal's federal candidate for Mayo), aiming to be pre-selected for the Legislative Council, has been recorded claiming miracles that most South Australians probably won't identify with. Specifically, she claims to have conducted the practice known as 'lay hands' so well that she cured a girl of her lactose intolerance. Hennessy noted, "we prayed for precious Daisy, and that was it. All dairy intolerance gone. She was really sick before then. God healed her completely", perhaps the most unintentionally funniest line said by a pre-selection hopeful. She also claims that her and her husband stopped their smoking addition - where she was smoking 30 a day and her husband 50 - when a friend of theirs simply said the word 'Lord' in prayer to them. All very interesting things to claim as someone wanting to run for parliament.

Surely though, the Liberals' other hopeful, Belinda Crawford-Marshall, the executive pastor at a Pentecostal church, must be a better choice right? Well, there is less of her claiming miracles, but she has previously posted to Facebook complaining about chemtrails. Now, you might think that both women have no chance of getting preselected based off all this, but you'd be forgetting that Alex Antic is the powerbroker throughout the SA Liberals and that he supports both of them. So, yeah, it is not unlikely that atleast one of Hennessy or Crawford-Marshall are on the Liberal's ticket next year.

News Articles


Daily Mail UK | Watch the moment a budding Liberal MP makes an INCREDIBLE claim about how she cured a young girl - as wild social media posts come back to haunt election hopefuls

News Clips

7 News


9 News


ABC



23/08/2025 - Tarzia and Mali face their demons


Over today and yesterday, both Labor Premier Peter Malinauskas and Liberal Leader of the Opposition Vincent Tarzia have been forced to, atleast in speech, deal with the longstanding issues facing their parties. In particular, both leaders were forced to reconcile with either past or future policy failures that would not do well electorally. 

Firstly, Malinauskas spoke at the Advertiser's Bush Summit yesterday, and during his interview delved on the topic of the state's ramping crisis. A massive issue going into the 2022 election, and one that still exists to this day, one of Labor's main attacks against the governing Liberals had been in regards to the failure to address ramping. Yesterday though, Malinauskas noted that his government hadn't deal with the ramping crisis in a satisfactory manner. Specifically, he stated, "In terms of the fixing the ramping crisis, of course we’d like better results. I’m not going to shy away from that. That would be unfair and not responsible." He even went so far to accept the label of his government's failure to deal with ramping as a 'broken electoral promise', not something you often see incumbent politicians do. He did naunce all this by pointing to the successes the state's Labor party has had, such as hiring more nurses and doctors beyond the initial targets, doubling promised hospital beds, and increasing spending overall. In any case, for many politicians, accepting that you have broken an electoral promise can often be the beginning of the end for your campaign. However, Malinauskas, well-loved by South Australians and a generally smart political operator, has likely accepted the label as to show humility, accepting that his government isn't perfect but has done work. Whether that strategy will work will come down to the media and the Liberals.

Speaking of, its not been a good day for Vincent Tarzia and the state Liberals. In a day that should've been used for pushing against Labor and the aforementioned election promise, Tarzia has instead been forced to go on the defensive. And not by anyone external either, in fact, it was by his own party. Today was the state Liberal AGM, meant to provide a clear direction for the party to go, looking towards the election. However, it became something of an 'undo' moment for the party, as Tarzia had to essentially prostrate himself in front of the media. The party's leader noted that the party had not only been distracted at times in his keynote address, but had also failed to connect to businesses and families in the state. Furthermore, Tarzia had to take the time to distance himself and the party from a leaked Liberal policy suggestion document. This document (likely coming from the Liberal's right faction (read: Antic)) held policy suggestions such as plans to "examine “excess deaths” linked to vaccinations, overturn Covid-19 vaccine mandates, restrict medical treatment for children with gender dysphoria and lobby the federal Liberals to overturn a policy to achieve net zero emissions by 2050". Such a policy platform would, quite obviously, alienate much of the centre-right in the state, and if implemented would destroy any small chance the Liberals have of winning. The fact that Tarzia had to respond to this is telling. 

If only the negatives stopped there for the Liberals. Unfortunately for them, The Advertiser came across ECSA disclosure documents, which revealed that less than a week before political donations were banned across the state, Dr Pamela Wall had donated 5 million dollars to the party. While obviously still legal at the time, the timing is obviously of interesting, and the donations size, the largest ever by an individual in SA, will raise eyebrows. Certainly, it will help the Liberals to campaign, but at the same time, could be used by Labor as a tool against them.

As a final note, Malinauskas did comment that Izak Rankine, the Crows Football player, deserved the 4 week sanction he got for using a homophobic slur on field during a game. 

News Articles

The Advertiser | SA Premier Peter Malinauskas concedes broken election promise over fixing ambulance ramping crisis

The Advertiser | SA Liberal Party receives $5 million donation from noted philanthropist Dr Pamela Wall

News Clips

7 News


9 News


ABC





21/08/2025 - The right bangs the culture war drums in South Australia

Firstly, there are no new political parties registering in the Gazette today, which makes me quite sad.

Moving on, it seems that culture war is the name of the game this week. A Parliamentary inquiry into the impact of stillbirths has seemingly struck a nerve with the state's right-wing parties, after one of the state's most senior health bureaucrats, Rebecca Graham, prefaced her evidence by stating that her use of women/woman was not intended to exclude transgender/intersex people. She quickly clarified her comments to The Australian, stating that her words were not intended "to imply that a transgender woman could give birth", a position that Labor Health Minister, Chris Picton, agreed with. He and Graham have both stated that Graham's preface was simply to ensure that all perspectives are considered.

However, this has not stopped the state's right-wing parties from jumping on the issue. The Liberals shadow Health spokesperson, Ashton Hurn, stated that "It’s a bizarre point to raise at the stillbirth committee when surely everyone in the health sector would agree only a biological woman can give birth to a baby and experience the trauma of a stillbirth first hand". Meanwhile, the Liberal's sadly ever-present Alex Antic used the moment to complain about the definition of what a man or woman was, and went so far as to state "will he [Premier Peter Malinauskas] allow it to freelance in radical gender theory?” Unfortunately for us, Family First also took their moment to chime in as well, with their Legislative Council candidate, Deepa Mathew, 'asking' both Malinauskas and the Liberal's Vincent Tarzia "whether the major parties agree with the falsehood that men can bear children". 

I should note that the founder of Still Aware (a stillbirth awareness charity), Claire Foord, stated that humanity should not be outraged "by how a person wants to identify, but rather that six babies are born stillborn in Australia every day". While she also expressed disagreeance with Graham bringing gender into the picture at all (and, according to The Australian, made some weird comments about the Women and Children's Hospital name that aren't on The Advertiser's article on it), she ended by saying that "I wish they had the same convinction towards that [stillbirths] argument.

Unfortunately for us, this wasn't the only culture war moment today. Premier Malinauskas, on a podcast with Kos Samaras and Nick Dyrenfurth (both Labor-affiliated), stated that Australians were 'turning away from both woke and anti-woke elements'. Furthermore, he suggested that Labor needs to do more to connect to both disillusioned young men and religious Australians, or see people like Andrew Tate continue to commandeer that space. He did go abit further though, stating that he thinks the association of masculinity and toxicity (atleast in terms of presence) is too perjorative. Finally, he stated that, progressives (which he included himself in) preach inclusion and tolerance but are quick to denounce Christianity, something he finds perverse. As you might guess, both The Australian and The Advertiser were quick to jump to attacking 'woke', with The Australian's title of "SA Premier strikes a chord by endorsing the end of woke" being so obviously just ragebait considering Malinauskas attacked both sides (even if was weighted to one side more). 

Hopefully my next update will be less about culture wars and more about other issues in the state, otherwise at this rate we'll be ending up in another culture war election, which, shockingly, will probably play better to Malinauskas' centre-left/centre Labor party's strengths. Also, as a sidenote, you'll notice that not a single centre/left-wing source has really picked up on all this, even though The Australian claimed the "stillbirth remark" fueled a "woke row". 


News Articles:





20/08/2025 - Family First opposes "any attempt to outlaw smacking in South Australia"


Well, this is not the next update I thought I was going to make. But Family First have decided to give us this to work with, so here we are. To give some background, earlier in the week a South Australian Royal Commission into Domestic Violence handed down its results and recommendations. One of these was to ban parents from disciplining children through the use of physical violence, such as slapping. Now, the Attorney-General has already come out and essentially said that South Australia has laws which deal with the issue well-enough, but said that the government would consider all recommendations carefully. This, of course, has caused Family First to blow a gasket.

Their head candidate, Deepa Mathew, has gone on record to state that the party will oppose any attempt to ban smacking. She also said some of the following quotes;

  • "But a smack on the backside without injury is not violence—it is a time-tested way to ensure children learn key life lessons."

  • "You can't negotiate with a two-year-old," she said. "Sometimes words are not enough to curb dangerous or defiant behaviour. A quick, measured smack has helped generations of parents set boundaries that children understand."

  • "Family First stands with responsible parents who love their children enough to teach them right from wrong. The state should be supporting parents, not undermining them with ideological bans."

Furthermore, she used a poll from the Advertiser (whose readers are generally right-wing and older) to claim that 80% of South Australians opposed banning smacking. I don't think I need to comment on how insane of a claim this is from that single source, so I'll just let you think on it. In any case, I really hope that this does not become even a minor part of the election campaign going forward, and remains as far away from normal people and politicians as possible. 

News Articles:


20/08/2025 - SA Liberals endorse Lamorna Alexander & Rebekah Rosser for the seats of Mount Gambier & Mackillop


We now know who will be facing the joint set of Liberals-turned-Independents who are currently in legal battles. Technically, we knew two days ago, but these two announcements got far overshadowed by Frank Pangallo. Lamorna Alexander, a lawyer, will be facing off against Troy Bell, who has been found guilty of stealing $430,000 from not-for-profit educational organisations in the seat of Mount Gambier. Rebekah Rosser, also a lawyer, will be taking on Nick McBride, who currently faces three charges of assaulting his wife. These two choices are perhaps the direct opposite of the parties' choice earlier this week to endorse Frank Pangallo for Waite, presenting two serious lawyers as choices in the state's South East vs someone who deliberately calls themselves an 'attack dog'.

More specifically, Alexander is someone who has worked on governance and regional politics across the Limestone Coast, having been part of Regional Assessment panels over the last two years. Rosser has less going for her in this department recently, having worked mostly with Cricket SA and Cricket Australia, but was at one point a ministerial advisor for Rob Kerin and had worked in John Howard's Liberal party as a clerk for the whip. Potentially bigger for her is the scuttlebutt going around that McBride's wife is looking to support her, and that could play massively in the election to come.

In my opinion, I think there's two stories that will play out here. First is Alexander's, which is unlikely to be a success. While Bell has been found guilty of his crimes, he is appealing, and they are less eye-catching than McBride's. She'll face strong opposition from Bell and the Labor candidate, and I don't think she has the backing to win there. Rosser, on the other hand, seems to have support from the current MHA's wife, and in a seat where Labor is unlikely to pull ahead (McBride absolutely destroyed Labor last election), it seems like it'll be a two-horse race where it comes down to whether McBride's alleged crimes have damaged his reputation enough. 

News Articles:




18/08/2025 - One Nation announces lead candidate, Carlos Quaremba

In an announcement that slipped under my radar, Pauline Hanson/One Nation has named their lead candidate for the election, State President Carlos Quaremba. Quaremba is not an entirely notable candidate, with his biggest 'claim to fame' being that he is currently a Councillor for Victor Harbour. He was their second candidate in the Federal Election, and funnily enough, his webpage hasn't been updated on the One Nation site, with it still mentioning him helping Jennifer Game (hilarious thing to leave on). In terms of policies, Quaremba has few, besides being anti-Labor and anti-net-zero.

Funnier than all this is that Hanson used the news article announcing Quaremba's candidature to lay into Sarah Game. Literally, she spent more time attacking her old MLC over uplifting her new candidate. Hanson described Game as lazy, untrustworthy, and stated that Game "didn't campaign one day". Game, for her part, called Hanson a liar and essentially two-faced. So, obviously, no love lost there. But it is really funny that Quaremba gets lost in an article that is meant to be about him. 

News Articles:

The Advertiser | Pauline Hanson lashes Sarah Game as “lazy” as Victor Harbor councillor announced as lead One Nation candidate for state election

18/08/2025 - Handshakegate continues

The event I am now dubbing Handshakegate has continued to make headlines today in SA. To sum up this mundane issue blown large, yesterday, when Frank Pangallo announced he was joining the Liberal Party, it seemed that he shunned SA Liberal's leader, Vincent Tarzia's, attempt to shake hands thrice over. As I mentioned yesterday, it was already well-known that Frank didn't hold much respect for Tarzia (and the Liberal Party as a whole), so this blunder has become a headline grabber. Labor and 7 News both have grabbed onto it with two hands, in any case.

In my opinion, its not that big of a deal, besides cementing what we already knew about Pangallo and Tarzia's relationship. It does leave room for speculation about Pangallo's true motives in the Liberal Party. Myself, and a few others I've talked to, are somewhat confident that Pangallo has entered the party with the objective of winning Waite while the rest of the Liberals flounder, and than oust Tarzia and rule over the ashes. Him and the Liberal Right faction are aligned, so it seems possible, although it does require Pangallo to win Waite which seems highly unlikely at this very moment.

News Articles:


News Clips:

7 News



17/08/2025 - Frank Pangallo joins the SA Liberal Party

Frank Pangallo, former news journalist and SA-Best/Independent MLC, has officially joined the Liberal Party and will be running in the seat of Waite at the next election. In his eyes, it's a natural way of working for the community which (and this isn't false) he's lived in for a decent while. On the other hand, Labor claims it is simply a way for Pangallo to try and keep his place in parliament. Either way, he has a 4% margin to overcome, which may not seem like alot until you consider Labor is currently polling better in the state than its results in the 2022 election.

Now, in my opinion, this is not going to be a successful move. Frank has some 'name brand' value in the state and is a dogged campaigner, certainly, but his style, personality, and politics just aren't what's needed to beat Labor and Catherine Hutchesson (the seat's MHA). Furthermore, Frank doesn't seem to respect Tarzia (not hard to think why) and is a very stubborn man, so it's very possible we see trouble in 'paradise' very soon. At the very least, it's not hard to think of a scenario where the SA Liberals look towards a certain policy or promise closer to the election that Frank disagrees with, and that causes a public spat. In addition to all this, I also think this is just a very poor use of a candidate like Frank. He isn't the best candidate for sure, but his name brand and style of campaigning is something you'd want working to boost your vote statewide, not just in one seat. This is sort of like if, when Fiona Patten joined Legalise Cannabis, she instead was put down as a candidate for a lower house seat, rather than the Senate. It's just a misuse of a candidate, that, to be fair, is quite representative of the SA Liberal's political intelligence these days.

News Articles:




News Clips:

7 News


9 News


ABC







South Australian 2026 Election - Political Updates Tracker 2.0

 Hello, and welcome to the second volume of my South Australian politics tracker! The original tracker was getting abit unwieldy (turns out ...